Jump to content

Vaccine nationalism puts world on brink of 'catastrophic moral failure': WHO chief


webfact

Recommended Posts

Vaccine nationalism puts world on brink of 'catastrophic moral failure': WHO chief

By Emma Farge

 

2021-01-18T103302Z_2_LYNXMPEH0H0FQ_RTROPTP_4_HEALTH-CORONAVIRUS-CHINA-WHO.JPG

FILE PHOTO: World Health Organization (WHO) Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus in Geneva Switzerland July 3, 2020. Fabrice Coffrini/Pool via REUTERS

 

GENEVA (Reuters) - The world is on the brink of "catastrophic moral failure" in sharing COVID-19 vaccines, the head of the World Health Organization said on Monday, urging countries and manufacturers to spread doses more fairly around the world.

 

WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said the prospects for equitable distribution were at "serious risk" just as its COVAX vaccine-sharing scheme aimed to start distributing inoculations next month.

 

He noted 44 bilateral deals were signed last year and at least 12 have already been signed this year.

 

"This could delay COVAX deliveries and create exactly the scenario COVAX was designed to avoid, with hoarding, a chaotic market, an uncoordinated response and continued social and economic disruption," he said.

 

Such a "me-first approach" left the world's poorest and most vulnerable at risk, he said at the opening of the body's annual Executive Board meeting in virtual format.

 

The world is on the brink of "catastrophic moral failure" in sharing COVID-19 vaccines, the head of the World Health Organization said on Monday, urging countries and manufacturers to spread doses more fairly around the world. Emily Wither reports.

 

"Ultimately these actions will only prolong the pandemic," he added, urging countries to avoid making the same mistakes made during the H1N1 and HIV pandemics.

 

The global scramble for shots has intensified as more infectious virus variants circulate.

 

Tedros said more than 39 million vaccine doses had been administered in 49 higher-income countries whereas just 25 doses had been given in one poor country.

 

A delegate from Burkina Faso, on behalf of the African group, expressed concern at the meeting that a few countries had "hoovered up" most of the supplies.

 

Observers say this board meeting, which last until next Tuesday, is one of the most important in the U.N. health agency's more than 70-year history and could shape its role in global health long after the pandemic ends.

 

On the agenda is reform of the body as well as its financing system, which was revealed as inadequate after its largest donor, the United States, announced its withdrawal last year.

 

"WHO has to remain relevant and ... has to come out of this crisis with more strength than before," said WHO Executive Board Vice-Chair Bjoern Kuemmel of Germany in comments last week.

 

But he expected resistance from some countries to pressure to boost financial contributions.

 

(Reporting by Emma Farge; Editing by Michael Shields and Nick Macfie)

 

reuters_logo.jpg

-- © Copyright Reuters 2021-01-19
 
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Boomer6969 said:

But is it a "moral failure" if those who did all the good work benefit first? 

 

Glad I am retired now, after 25 years in the UN system I have enough of this third world belly aching.

OK, so the scientists and medical professionals who developed the vaccine get first shot.

 

Who else ‘did all the good work’?

 

 

Edited by Chomper Higgot
  • Sad 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Countries pre-ordered 5 or 6 vaccines, because they weren't sure which ones would work, not realizing that they're all good.  Surely, the excess doses can be fairly redistributed to poorer countries. Bigger countries, such as Brazil, USA, and China really need all the vaccines they can get hold of, and its really political issues within these countries that is the major problem.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is called selfishness when a country tries and gobble up as much of the vaccine as they can, and then in turn instead of sharing it they will try and jack the price through the roof and offer it to others who can pay for it.  It unfortunately will become a free for all if there are no calming forces that get together and find a way to commonality and treat the world as a whole.

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Natai Beach said:

The result of this swift decisive action in Thailand limited the first wave in Thailand to just a trickle. If all governments had followed the Thai example we wouldn’t be anywhere near 90 million infections and 2 million dead. 

 

Dream on, local climate is a lot more important that people seem to think

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The irony is, with a few exceptions, that the majority of "poor" countries to date are relatively unscathed by Covid.

A rash of Latino countries have been hit hard, but very few in the poorest continent of Africa are suffering. Berkino Faso for example has 5 deaths per million, compared to the European average of around 900. Brazil is now rolling out AstraZeneca and Sinovac vaccines, while the Indians will have a number to choose from.

WHO Director-General is not doing his organisation any favours, especially when you consider where the funding comes from and that by and large, those are the countries that are doing it tough. 

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Donga said:

The irony is, with a few exceptions, that the majority of "poor" countries to date are relatively unscathed by Covid.

 

Take the UK for example, the average age of death of a COVID patient is 82.

 

I think that covers most of the difference between the rich and the poor countries.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, mommysboy said:

Countries pre-ordered 5 or 6 vaccines, because they weren't sure which ones would work, not realizing that they're all good.  

 

 

Links with scientific evidence ,  { not from the WHO }

would be much appreciated , thank you .

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, pacovl46 said:

We had the first few Corona cases in Germany already in November, but back then the doctors thought it’s just a heavy flu. Which makes me think that they had Corona already in the summer of 2019 in China. If that’s the case they took 6 months to inform the rest of the world and that only because the west found out more or less themselves! In other words, the Chinese swept it under the rug like they always do! Anything to not tarnish their reputations! The irony is that their reputation went down the drain a looooooooooooooong time ago already, they just don’t see it! 

Or, just maybe, like the Germans, they thought it was the flu, too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Elkski said:

I returned from BKK through shanghai on the 21st so I was very interested in all the early medical reports and I read all that Who posted on Twitter and watched all the pressors.  I will never forgive Who or support them in any way ever again.  They seemed like the red lap dog from day 1. 

In what way were you supporting WHO before the pandemic?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...