4 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

You think the NY Times is the relevant authority to decide when charges will be laid? LOL.

Give me a quote from the DOJ or the FBI and I'll believe it.

I said multiple sources.
Did you even read the links, or just dismiss to try and point score ?
Are your search engines down ? Do you want to be spoon fed ?
I gave you two links. If you do not want to accept them because they do not suit your narrative, go and do some looking yourself.
Poor attempt at deflection and denial.
 

Just now, tilaceer said:

I said multiple sources.
Are your search engines down ? Do you want to be spoon fed ?
I gave you two links. If you do not want to accept them because they do not suit your narrative, go and do some looking yourself.
Poor attempt at deflection and denial.
 

It's not up to me to research YOUR claims.

Just now, thaibeachlovers said:

It's not up to me to research YOUR claims.

Not my claims.

4 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Reportedly is not, by definition, factual.

Neither is the BIG LIE factual without evidence.  But just keep drinking the kool aide.

4 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

It's not up to me to research YOUR claims.

He gave you the links to the claims, you've been spoon fed again but trolling is easier for you 

14 hours ago, candide said:

More like looking for a good laugh! Trump can be quite entertaining. ????

In 1984, an exasperated Dem candidate (Mondale) did say of Ronnie Reagan "you can't choose a president on entertainment value."

So he's wrong on this twice so far.

 

 

What amazes me is there are so many Americans who support trump, they do not seem to see or care that he is just out for himself, is a liar, and divides America. Makes Americans who follow him look very stupid which sadly reflects on how people look at America as a whole.

19 minutes ago, stupidfarang said:

What amazes me is there are so many Americans who support trump, they do not seem to see or care that he is just out for himself, is a liar, and divides America. Makes Americans who follow him look very stupid which sadly reflects on how people look at America as a whole.

 I saw no evidence of your unsupported claim.

 

I saw an incredible patriot who was baselessly smeared and attacked by the losing party both before his election and during his term. He was falsely accused without evidence of all manner of dreadful crimes, even impeached twice on nonsensical charges which wasted years and destroyed the concept of impeachment(it was not meant to be a tool to demonstrate hatred of a politician  that beat you).

 

 I ask, what person that is "just out for himself" would donate his entire salary to good causes. Does Biden donate his entire salary?

 

"During his 2016 campaign, Donald Trump promised to donate his salary if elected President. It was a promise, even his critics acknowledge, that Trump was keeping."

https://www.forbes.com/sites/adamandrzejewski/2021/02/27/president-donald-trump-probably-donated-his-entire-16m-salary-back-to-the-us-government--here-are-the-details/?sh=362faff31a8d

 

 Calling others "stupid" because they can see through the 6 years of lies and dishonesty used to attack DJT does not reflect well on your ability to form judgements, and certainly shows a lack of respect for those with differing opinions than you hold yourself. 

8 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

 I saw no evidence of your unsupported claim.

 

I saw an incredible patriot who was baselessly smeared and attacked by the losing party both before his election and during his term. He was falsely accused without evidence of all manner of dreadful crimes, even impeached twice on nonsensical charges which wasted years and destroyed the concept of impeachment(it was not meant to be a tool to demonstrate hatred of a politician  that beat you).

 

 I ask, what person that is "just out for himself" would donate his entire salary to good causes. Does Biden donate his entire salary?

 

"During his 2016 campaign, Donald Trump promised to donate his salary if elected President. It was a promise, even his critics acknowledge, that Trump was keeping."

https://www.forbes.com/sites/adamandrzejewski/2021/02/27/president-donald-trump-probably-donated-his-entire-16m-salary-back-to-the-us-government--here-are-the-details/?sh=362faff31a8d

 

 Calling others "stupid" because they can see through the 6 years of lies and dishonesty used to attack DJT does not reflect well on your ability to form judgements, and certainly shows a lack of respect for those with differing opinions than you hold yourself. 

What amazes me is there are so many Americans who support trump, they do not seem to see or care that he is just out for himself, is a liar, and divides America. Makes Americans who follow him look very stupid which sadly reflects on how people look at America as a whole.

 

QED

4 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Trump apparently lives to be in the media spotlight. Those that decided to raid his place would have known that, so this is down to them. Without such to keep the headlines going, Trump's media exposure might have diminished, but they just keep on giving him ammunition to keep himself in the spotlight.

LOL.

My comments were in response to your buddy saying that the publicity about the raid was all about the dems deflecting the narrative so they wouldn't have to answer "to the American people about important issues". 

 

So you admit the publicly is all Trump's doing? 

Why didn't you just cut me out of the loop and respond directly to the source?

 

Obviously, you lot are so confused about the facts you cannot agree on what is reality between yourselves.

 

29 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

 I saw no evidence of your unsupported claim.

 

I saw an incredible patriot who was baselessly smeared and attacked by the losing party both before his election and during his term. He was falsely accused without evidence of all manner of dreadful crimes, even impeached twice on nonsensical charges which wasted years and destroyed the concept of impeachment(it was not meant to be a tool to demonstrate hatred of a politician  that beat you).

 

 I ask, what person that is "just out for himself" would donate his entire salary to good causes. Does Biden donate his entire salary?

 

"During his 2016 campaign, Donald Trump promised to donate his salary if elected President. It was a promise, even his critics acknowledge, that Trump was keeping."

https://www.forbes.com/sites/adamandrzejewski/2021/02/27/president-donald-trump-probably-donated-his-entire-16m-salary-back-to-the-us-government--here-are-the-details/?sh=362faff31a8d

 

 Calling others "stupid" because they can see through the 6 years of lies and dishonesty used to attack DJT does not reflect well on your ability to form judgements, and certainly shows a lack of respect for those with differing opinions than you hold yourself. 

Well, in 2005, the year for which Trump's tax returns were leaked, he had to pay an alternative minimum tax of 31 million dollars in addition to the 5.3 million he paid that year.

https://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxvox/lessons-donald-trumps-tax-return-and-amt

His tax reform bill of 2017 has effectively rendered the AMT mostly toothless. 

His tax bill also greatly increased the benefits of pass-along corporations. Most of Trump's businesses follow that model

His tax bill also reduced the real estate depreciation schedule from 20 to 10 years. 20 years was bad enough. The point of deprecation is to account for loss of value in something over the years. Does real estate generally lose its value? But now, instead of 20 years it's 10. And after those 10 years are up, all Trump has to do is to create another pass along corporation, sell the depreciated building to that corporation, and once again be able to milk it for tax deductions.

His salary is chump change compared to the gains he must have made thanks to that tax bill.

There as also the case where he claimed he gave a donation to the 9-11 fund. No evidence has yet been uncovered that he gave it anything.

Some patriot!

2 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

But but but,

according to some posters he's guilty, so why wait?

 

Walker88 Posted Sunday at 11:43 PM on this thread

45 broke the law. Guilty just by possession. If he used them, or intended to use them for personal gain, that is 'conspiracy to commit espionage', is a capital offense, and he could (should) be executed.

Don’t bother ‘But But Buting’ me.

 

I’m the one stating follow procedure and give the suspect his Constitutional right to have the evidence against him reviewed by a Grand Jury and have the Grand Jury decide if indictment is warranted.

Some troll posts trolling about Hitler have been removed.

4 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

 I saw no evidence of your unsupported claim.

 

I saw an incredible patriot who was baselessly smeared and attacked by the losing party both before his election and during his term. He was falsely accused without evidence of all manner of dreadful crimes, even impeached twice on nonsensical charges which wasted years and destroyed the concept of impeachment(it was not meant to be a tool to demonstrate hatred of a politician  that beat you).

 

 I ask, what person that is "just out for himself" would donate his entire salary to good causes. Does Biden donate his entire salary?

 

"During his 2016 campaign, Donald Trump promised to donate his salary if elected President. It was a promise, even his critics acknowledge, that Trump was keeping."

https://www.forbes.com/sites/adamandrzejewski/2021/02/27/president-donald-trump-probably-donated-his-entire-16m-salary-back-to-the-us-government--here-are-the-details/?sh=362faff31a8d

 

 Calling others "stupid" because they can see through the 6 years of lies and dishonesty used to attack DJT does not reflect well on your ability to form judgements, and certainly shows a lack of respect for those with differing opinions than you hold yourself. 

Oh dear, someone has overdosed on the cult Kool-Aid by the looks of things.

Sad, so very sad.

 

Just a point though, you mention six years of lies and dishonesty used to attack trump, well it's well documented that he lies on a regular basis, that he stole funds from a charity to fund his election campaign, that he has failed to pay tradespeople working on his property in the past, and that he has had many failed businesses, so I don't think people are, as you say, "showing a lack of respect", just stating the truth. And that hurts for the Kool-Aid gang.

4 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

 I saw no evidence of your unsupported claim.

 

I saw an incredible patriot who was baselessly smeared and attacked by the losing party both before his election and during his term. He was falsely accused without evidence of all manner of dreadful crimes, even impeached twice on nonsensical charges which wasted years and destroyed the concept of impeachment(it was not meant to be a tool to demonstrate hatred of a politician  that beat you).

 

 I ask, what person that is "just out for himself" would donate his entire salary to good causes. Does Biden donate his entire salary?

 

"During his 2016 campaign, Donald Trump promised to donate his salary if elected President. It was a promise, even his critics acknowledge, that Trump was keeping."

https://www.forbes.com/sites/adamandrzejewski/2021/02/27/president-donald-trump-probably-donated-his-entire-16m-salary-back-to-the-us-government--here-are-the-details/?sh=362faff31a8d

 

 Calling others "stupid" because they can see through the 6 years of lies and dishonesty used to attack DJT does not reflect well on your ability to form judgements, and certainly shows a lack of respect for those with differing opinions than you hold yourself. 

An incredible patriot?  As evidenced by what?  His service record?  Nope.  His charitable work?  No again.  His fondling flags with a goofy smirk on his face?  Only an idiot would fall for that.

 

Falsely accused without evidence?  There was ample evidence for both impeachments.  If you want to see an example of accusations without evidence, look at the "born in Kenya" nonsense leveled at Obama before he was elected and continuing through both terms.  Who was that fat idiot leading the birther nonsense?

 

Regarding Trump donating his salary, he enriched himself in office with tax breaks, an outrageous increase in the admission fee to Mar-a-Lago, and lobbyist foreign and domestic spending vast sums at his properties, secure in the knowledge that doing so might not benefit them but not doing so would land them on his sh*t list.

 

And now he has been caught stealing, uh, in-possession-of government documents that he refused to return and denied having.  Why did he have these documents?  No one can say.  Why wouldn't he return them?  Also no answer.  How can anyone defend him now that he's been caught red-handed?  That continues to puzzle me.

6 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

I saw an incredible patriot....

Wow, total Twilight Zone moment!

Barr spoke directly to Republican outcries about the nature of the “unprecedented” search of a former president, offering a counterpoint: “It's also unprecedented for a president to take all this classified information and put them in a country club.” “And how long is the government going to try to get that back? They jaw bone for a year. They were deceived on the voluntary actions taken. They then went and got a subpoena. They were deceived on that, they feel, and the facts are starting to show that they were being jerked around. And so how long, you know, how long do they wait?” Barr said in an interview on Fox.

https://www.politico.com/news/2022/09/02/bill-barr-trump-fbi-mar-a-lago-00054716

15 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

 I saw no evidence of your unsupported claim.

 

I saw an incredible patriot who was baselessly smeared and attacked by the losing party both before his election and during his term. He was falsely accused without evidence of all manner of dreadful crimes, even impeached twice on nonsensical charges which wasted years and destroyed the concept of impeachment(it was not meant to be a tool to demonstrate hatred of a politician  that beat you).

 

 I ask, what person that is "just out for himself" would donate his entire salary to good causes. Does Biden donate his entire salary?

 

"During his 2016 campaign, Donald Trump promised to donate his salary if elected President. It was a promise, even his critics acknowledge, that Trump was keeping."

https://www.forbes.com/sites/adamandrzejewski/2021/02/27/president-donald-trump-probably-donated-his-entire-16m-salary-back-to-the-us-government--here-are-the-details/?sh=362faff31a8d

 

 Calling others "stupid" because they can see through the 6 years of lies and dishonesty used to attack DJT does not reflect well on your ability to form judgements, and certainly shows a lack of respect for those with differing opinions than you hold yourself. 

see no evil hear no evil....

21 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

 I saw no evidence of your unsupported claim.

 

I saw an incredible patriot who was baselessly smeared and attacked by the losing party both before his election and during his term. He was falsely accused without evidence of all manner of dreadful crimes, even impeached twice on nonsensical charges which wasted years and destroyed the concept of impeachment(it was not meant to be a tool to demonstrate hatred of a politician  that beat you).

 

 I ask, what person that is "just out for himself" would donate his entire salary to good causes. Does Biden donate his entire salary?

 

"During his 2016 campaign, Donald Trump promised to donate his salary if elected President. It was a promise, even his critics acknowledge, that Trump was keeping."

https://www.forbes.com/sites/adamandrzejewski/2021/02/27/president-donald-trump-probably-donated-his-entire-16m-salary-back-to-the-us-government--here-are-the-details/?sh=362faff31a8d

 

 Calling others "stupid" because they can see through the 6 years of lies and dishonesty used to attack DJT does not reflect well on your ability to form judgements, and certainly shows a lack of respect for those with differing opinions than you hold yourself. 

And what respect has Trump for people? Your statement just supports my comment 100%. But it is a democracy so everyone is free to express what they want. 

The WP are now reporting that the FBI recovered TS/SCI documents from Mar a Largo relating to nuclear weapons secrets and to the nuclear secrets and capabilities of another nation.

 

Trump’s American  supporters can now contemplate the seriousness of his crimes.

 

Trump’s non American supporters can no contemplate the possibility that it’s their own country’s nuclear secrets Trump had stollen.

 

The question still remains, who else got to see these TS/SCI documents?

2 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

The WP are now reporting that the FBI recovered TS/SCI documents from Mar a Largo relating to nuclear weapons secrets and to the nuclear secrets and capabilities of another nation.

 

Trump’s American  supporters can now contemplate the seriousness of his crimes.

 

Trump’s non American supporters can no contemplate the possibility that it’s their own country’s nuclear secrets Trump had stollen.

 

The question still remains, who else got to see these TS/SCI documents?

What's much more troubling is if these supposedly papers of nuclear secrets can go missing without anyone knowing.

 

If one had criminal intent on stealing nuclear secrets would one not simply snap a few pics and be done with it. Why take the papers? Unless of course there was no criminal intent. 

10 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

The WP are now reporting that the FBI recovered TS/SCI documents from Mar a Largo relating to nuclear weapons secrets and to the nuclear secrets and capabilities of another nation.

 

Trump’s American  supporters can now contemplate the seriousness of his crimes.

 

Trump’s non American supporters can no contemplate the possibility that it’s their own country’s nuclear secrets Trump had stollen.

 

The question still remains, who else got to see these TS/SCI documents?

LOL.

Was it not you that said on a different thread that there were no leaks?

 

To remind you:

Chomper Higgot

• Star Member
• 
• Advanced Member
• 45240
• 18135 posts

Posted 20 hours ago

23 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Excellent news.

Hopefully that will stop any leaks happening.

What leaks?

 

AG Garland is running a tight ship.

 

Nobody even saw a search of a former President’s home coming, until Trump himself broadcast the fact on his failing ‘Truth Social’ soapbox.

 

14 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

The WP are now reporting that the FBI recovered TS/SCI documents from Mar a Largo relating to nuclear weapons secrets and to the nuclear secrets and capabilities of another nation.

 

Trump’s American  supporters can now contemplate the seriousness of his crimes.

 

Trump’s non American supporters can no contemplate the possibility that it’s their own country’s nuclear secrets Trump had stollen.

 

The question still remains, who else got to see these TS/SCI documents?

Seems when Trump says "hoax" his supporters believe him. Rather paradoxical when he is infamous for his documented 30,000 lies over his presidency term.

 

Trump on Truth Social...“Nuclear weapons issue is a Hoax, just like Russia, Russia, Russia was a Hoax, two Impeachments were a Hoax, the Mueller investigation was a Hoax, and much more. Same sleazy people involved,” he wrote, going on to suggest that FBI agents might have planted evidence against him.

 

Yet all these hoaxes have now been proven to be fact!

 

Material on foreign nation’s nuclear capabilities seized at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago - The Washington Post (archive.org)

6 minutes ago, EVENKEEL said:

What's much more troubling is if these supposedly papers of nuclear secrets can go missing without anyone knowing.

 

If one had criminal intent on stealing nuclear secrets would one not simply snap a few pics and be done with it. Why take the papers? Unless of course there was no criminal intent. 

Let’s start with who the thief is - at the time he stole the documents he was the President of the United States, Commander in Chief.

 

The guy the rightwing (and his hand picked AG) were arguing  was above the law.

 

 

1 minute ago, thaibeachlovers said:

LOL.

Was it not you that said on a different thread that there were no leaks?

 

To remind you:

Chomper Higgot

• Star Member
• 
• Advanced Member
• 45240
• 18135 posts

 

Posted 20 hours ago

What leaks?

 

AG Garland is running a tight ship.

 

Nobody even saw a search of a former President’s home coming, until Trump himself broadcast the fact on his failing ‘Truth Social’ soapbox.

 

Who said it was a leak?

 

It may very well have been a considered press release.

 

6 minutes ago, EVENKEEL said:

What's much more troubling is if these supposedly papers of nuclear secrets can go missing without anyone knowing.

 

If one had criminal intent on stealing nuclear secrets would one not simply snap a few pics and be done with it. Why take the papers? Unless of course there was no criminal intent. 

What non-criminal intent could there be?

Regardless of what the Trump supporters think, this is very, very bad.

 

"A document describing a foreign government’s military defenses, including its nuclear capabilities, was found by FBI agents who searched former president Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence and private club last month, according to people familiar with the matter, underscoring concerns among U.S. intelligence officials about classified material stashed in the Florida property."

"Some of the seized documents detail top-secret U.S. operations so closely guarded that many senior national security officials are kept in the dark about them. Only the president, some members of his Cabinet or a near-Cabinet-level official could authorize other government officials to know details of these special-access programs, according to people familiar with the search, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe sensitive details of an ongoing investigation."   https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/09/06/trump-nuclear-documents/

We learn Trump stole nuclear secrets.

 

Trump supporters respond (paraphrased).

 

‘The most serious problem here is we got to find out about it.’

 

 

 

 

1 minute ago, LosLobo said:

Seems when Trump says "hoax" his supporters believe him. Rather paradoxical when he is infamous for his documented 30,000 lies over his presidency term.

 

Trump on Truth Social...“Nuclear weapons issue is a Hoax, just like Russia, Russia, Russia was a Hoax, two Impeachments were a Hoax, the Mueller investigation was a Hoax, and much more. Same sleazy people involved,” he wrote, going on to suggest that FBI agents might have planted evidence against him.

 

Yet all these hoaxes have been proven to be fact!

 

Material on foreign nation’s nuclear capabilities seized at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago - The Washington Post (archive.org)

Far as I remember, the Russia thing was pretty much dismissed as fake, based on the Steele invention. Certainly, no charges were aid against Trump based on it. Is the BBC a satisfactory source?

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-59168626

In 2019, the Mueller investigation concluded that it could not determine any criminal conspiracy between Moscow and the Trump campaign.

 

This is deja vu, given we were being constantly told he was guilty, and going to jail back then.

Just now, thaibeachlovers said:

Far as I remember, the Russia thing was pretty much dismissed as fake, based on the Steele invention. Certainly, no charges were aid against Trump based on it. Is the BBC a satisfactory source?

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-59168626

In 2019, the Mueller investigation concluded that it could not determine any criminal conspiracy between Moscow and the Trump campaign.

 

This is deja vu, given we were being constantly told he was guilty, and going to jail back then.

I guess you think the indictable offenses recorded in the Muller report have been forgotten about.