Trump doesn’t like the term ‘woke’: ‘Half the people can’t even define it’
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Topics
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
-
Latest posts...
-
7,024
-
5
Thai - Cambodia Conflict F16 & Gripen Aircraft Strike Cambodian Military Positions Near Border
I posted this in another thread. Mate in Kantaralak, Si Saket said that since the 711 was hit (5km from his joint) in his words "it's been payback big time my windows are rattling" Reckons Kantaralak is a ghost town with lots of artillery going off. This will be over soon. Cambodia cannot match Thailand. He gives it a week and I tend to agree. -
197
EU Russia threatens UK with nuclear annihilation in unhinged WW3 rant
One doesn't need big cojones to push the Button Being Mad/Crazy/Insane is enough to do Stupid planned things. -
33
It seems that that the Covid pandemic scared people stupid
Right there! Thanks SeaBee. ☝️ "Hallaluya!!! COVID CURED THE FLU IT'S A MIRACLE!!!." 👆 And I have a bridge over the River Kwai that I'm selling. If you believe that Covid cured the flu, I'll sell it to you half priced. Get it quick, offer expires soon! Do you people who bought that bovine excrement actually know what a "Confidence Game" is? My guess is that the same people who believe that "Covid Cured The Flu" are probably ripe pickings for call center scams. -
18
Thai - Cambodia Conflict Tensions Soar as Thaksin Blasts Cambodia for Border Violations
Did some browsing yesterday. The border issue is since 1907, never been solved. That is a 115 years span to resolve problems. Also came up a remark, which stated, Thaksin has a personal vete with Hun Sen. Left the browsing on it, not investigating further. I can only conclude, again, little children on places where they shouldnt be. Ego, power, money and the rest of population is collateral damage. Well humans, they way we are. -
43
Thai - Cambodia Conflict Thai Troops Retaliate, 100 Cambodian Soldiers Dead in Fierce Clash
A very biased and simplex revision of history - you missed quite a few things. In 1904 there was a Treaty made between French Indochina and Thailand that specified the borders. On that basis the temples (there are several) were all inside Thailand. That map drawn up by French mapmakers in 1907 was wrong and it was never part of the Treaty. In fact I doubt the Thais saw it for a very long time - probably decades later - and they just ignored it - they had their own maps. The 1907 map was dragged out by Cambodia in 1960s in a Court case that Thailand did not accept - Thailand are not a signatory to the ICJ. The People's of Isaan and Cambodia and Loas are all related back in the past and are a 'common people' - they all go back to the Khmer period. Under the Treaty with French Indochina Thailand ceded Siem Riep to them - before that Thailand 'owned' it going back to when they conquered the Khmer Empire in 1400s. I dislike it when people state such obvious mistruths and distortions that only take a little research of history to show not true. I am not saying you lied - but your conclusions are wrong because they are not based on all the information - in fact that is what Cambodia did in the past and are doing again. Hun Sen is linked to people who were part of the Pol Pot regime - he was in 20s at that time. You are very correct when you said this - The dispute is a complex mix of international law, colonial history, regional geopolitics, and national pride. Thailand believes that the ICJ Court was very biased and in error - they never gave up control over the areas surrounding those temples to . But Thailand has acknowledged their decision about the temples. But the decision was not about the borders - and Thailand maintains that the temples are inside Thailand and will never change the border line without serious reasons. Between 1904 and 1953 when Cambodia became independent from France the borders were what Thailand believed them to be - almost 50 years. Later claims by Cambodia in 1960s that the 1907 unofficial map was the boundary are patently false. But with Thailand refusing to be a member of the ICJ - it is clear the ICJ decision was biased.
-
-
Popular in The Pub
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now