Jump to content

Man who threatened Biden shot dead in FBI raid in Utah


Social Media

Recommended Posts

Just now, ozimoron said:

Is there some evidence that this man was incapable of carrying his gun out to a car and driving somewhere? That's the argument being put by his apologists.

Well, the could have waited him out. But that could have necessitated evacuating the neighborhood for who knows how long.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, placeholder said:

Well, the could have waited him out. But that could have necessitated evacuating the neighborhood for who knows how long.

And not just the neighbors, those weapons were capable of firing hundreds of bullets in a few seconds which would carry for long distances and pose a huge threat in an urban environment. The FBI would not have known whether or not he had bump stocks or extended magazines either.

Edited by ozimoron
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

And not just the neighbors, those weapons were capable of firing hundreds of bullets in a few seconds which would carry for long distances and pose a huge threat in an urban environment. The FBI would not have known whether or not he had bump stocks or extended magazines either.

Good point.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Hanaguma said:

No more fictionalizing than those who say that he was waving a gun at the agents who kicked down his door. I would be happy to be wrong about this- assuming the FBI were wearing body cameras it could be cleared up in a jiffy. 

 

Any recent photos of Robertson show him sitting or leaning against something. A 75 year old 300 pound man is largely immobile.

But still able to pull a trigger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BritManToo said:

From your link, age 75 and obese (elderly and homebound)  ........ so fairly harmless IMHO.

 

From an eyewitness,

"'I don't think he was even given a chance to even see a warrant when they went in and raided house,' Bunch added." 

'As an elderly- and largely homebound-man, there was very little he could do but exercise his First Amendment right to free speech and voice his protest in what has become the public square of our age — the internet and social media,' his family also said in their statement."

"I don't think..." In other words, he doesn't know.

As for the First Amendment claim...it doesn't cover death threats.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Pure conspiracy garbage.

 

Think something up, anything you want, then claim it possible because you’ve not seen evidence to refute the garbage you yourself dreamed up.

 

 

Odd, you're usually all for people's rights, I think less of you for this post.

The elderly and mentally ill (possibly suffering from dementia) should be treated with care and compassion, not shot in their own homes.

 

The FBI ruled this housebound guy a 'credible threat' to a Biden visit later that day.

Blocking his driveway for the day would have been enough to removed any credible threat until Biden would have been out of his reach again. 

 

It's not as if Biden was going to drive past his house.

Edited by BritManToo
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, placeholder said:

If someone is elderly and making death threats, and/or is demented, he shouldn't be in possession of weapons. Maybe his family should stop blaming the Feds and look at themselves to assign culpability.

Obviously, I don't think less of you for your post.

 

What has the world come to when the woke, liberal socialist, climate alarmists revel in the killing of a 75 year old man by law enforcement officers? 

  • Sad 1
  • Love It 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BritManToo said:

Obviously, I don't think less of you for your post.

 

What has the world come to when the woke, liberal socialist, climate alarmists revel in the killing of a 75 year old man by law enforcement officers? 

Obviously, I couldn't care less what you think of me.

And where have I reveled in the death of this person? Stop making things up.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, EVENKEEL said:

I only know what you wrote. I can't read minds so I don't know what you meant.

Nonsense. First off, you did claim to know what he meant by your unhedged interpretation of his remark. Which was further confirmed by your claim that Chomper Higgott agreed with you.

 

And if his comment has been made out of the blue you might possibly have a point. But it was made in reply to someone else. So the content was clear to anyone who didn't willfully ignore it. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

 

What has the world come to when the woke, liberal socialist, climate alarmists revel in the killing of a 75 year old man by law enforcement officers? 

The old guy making violent threats with a gun in his hand is obviously not the only one with his finger on a trigger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

What has the world come to when you falsely claim that anybody here is reveling in this mans death.

 

You've made it clear you don't believe circumstances as presented by the FBI so there's little reasoning with you. You even went on to claim that the killing of unarmed civilians happens often in the UK by law enforcement. I have to say you're deluded.

Like most on here, you have an 'off the shelf' democrat worldview so your cultural programming doesn't allow you to consider anything outside of the box which you are in.  

 

That's fine though.  

 

Scott Fitzgerald famously wrote:

“The test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposing ideas in mind at the same time and still retain the ability to function. One should, for example, be able to see that things are hopeless yet be determined to make them otherwise.”

 

“Any year that passes in which you don’t destroy one of your best-loved ideas is a wasted year,” says Charlie Munger. 

 

 

Edited by ICU Kid
  • Sad 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BritManToo said:

From your link, age 75 and obese (elderly and homebound)  ........ so fairly harmless IMHO.

 

From an eyewitness,

"'I don't think he was even given a chance to even see a warrant when they went in and raided house,' Bunch added." 

'As an elderly- and largely homebound-man, there was very little he could do but exercise his First Amendment right to free speech and voice his protest in what has become the public square of our age — the internet and social media,' his family also said in their statement."

Yes, that’s what the family are saying. What else do you expect them to say? How do you explain away the equipment he is wearing and brandishing? Just for fun?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, placeholder said:

Nonsense. First off, you did claim to know what he meant by your unhedged interpretation of his remark. Which was further confirmed by your claim that Chomper Higgott agreed with you.

 

And if his comment has been made out of the blue you might possibly have a point. But it was made in reply to someone else. So the content was clear to anyone who didn't willfully ignore it. 

 

I'm sure your nonsensical post has a meaning to you, for me not so much. Keep practicing, I'm sure you'll improve over time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BritManToo said:

Obviously, I don't think less of you for your post.

 

What has the world come to when the woke, liberal socialist, climate alarmists revel in the killing of a 75 year old man by law enforcement officers? 

You are posting nonsense again…

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BritManToo said:

Odd, you're usually all for people's rights, I think less of you for this post.

The elderly and mentally ill (possibly suffering from dementia) should be treated with care and compassion, not shot in their own homes.

 

The FBI ruled this housebound guy a 'credible threat' to a Biden visit later that day.

Blocking his driveway for the day would have been enough to removed any credible threat until Biden would have been out of his reach again. 

 

It's not as if Biden was going to drive past his house.

Do you think it was only about Biden’s visit? Was that his only threat?

Why don’t you try it here and see where it gets you? Elderly and mentally ill? Not even his family claims mental illness. He chose to live by the sword…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, NextG said:

Do you think it was only about Biden’s visit? Was that his only threat?

Why don’t you try it here and see where it gets you? Elderly and mentally ill? Not even his family claims mental illness. He chose to live by the sword…

I think 'credible threat' is the point.

Housebound elderly folk can't really be much of a threat to anyone outside their house.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...