3 hours ago, stoner said:

 

they are all filth. i was calling trump out on here a long time ago. called trump a dancing orange monkey. even got banned for it. now look what is said about him with the name calling. so spare me your righteous indignation.  

 

where were you then to support the things i was saying that were anti trump. 

 

the whole system is corrupt. biden shattered the glass ceiling so to speak eh. 

Are you sure you want to stay on record calling all Americans who will vote, or have voted previously, for Trump 'filth' ? That's a huge amount of 'filth'.

9 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

your mate is though, right after you said it!!

 

age didn't seem to be an issue when it was Biden, you defended him to the hilt, that soon changed when you totally forgot about him.

The funny thing is that biden gave the dems the best shot of winning

6 minutes ago, Thingamabob said:

Are you sure you want to stay on record calling all Americans who will vote, or have voted previously, for Trump 'filth' ? That's a huge amount of 'filth'.

 

woah cowboy........i meant politicians. 

22 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

your mate is though, right after you said it!!

 

age didn't seem to be an issue when it was Biden, you defended him to the hilt, that soon changed when you totally forgot about him.

Now you're just making stuff up. I NEVER defended Biden. I posted repeatedly how he claimed he would be a transactional candidate, how his extreme hubris was going to be the death of Democracy.

 

But that's to be expected from a red hat.

Posts with derogatory nicknames, intentional misspellings or personal remarks will be removed. Spell names correctly for all sides of the debate.

Reading the stilted and unnatural writing in this article made me realize that there were no humans involved in its writing. This is the wonderful future we have thanks to AI, computer-generated drivel instead of journalism.

https://www.thelist.com/1653936/dana-bash-tough-act-on-kamala-harris-cnn-interview-has-everyone-saying-same-thing-about-trump/

That very toughness, however, struck many as problematic and arguably even biased. Bash was notably one of the moderators at the June presidential debate, where she allowed Donald Trump to make several eyebrow-raising claims without asking any follow-up questions or correcting his inaccuracies.

Read More: https://www.thelist.com/1653936/dana-bash-tough-act-on-kamala-harris-cnn-interview-has-everyone-saying-same-thing-about-trump/

3 hours ago, thesetat2013 said:

You know.... aLL you guys always quoting about Trumps felony convictions.. Perhaps you do not know what is a white collar crime? Trump is no morderer, thief, or drug dealer. His conviction can still be overturned. But the way you all throw it around makes it seem like he did something really bad.. It does not take much to make a felony in the USA. I would bet my shorts that many foreigners living in Thailand cheat their pensions by having some sort of business or side work which would be considered a felony in the USA. Yet, every day you all throw it around like he did something really bad.

 

Congrats on achieving a new level of whataboutism that hadn't been reached before! What about all the criminals here posting on ASEAN Now? LOL!

 

Just an FYI - I very much doubt that many posters on ASEAN Now have committed felonies in their home countries. That you downplay felony convictions for a candidate for the highest office as being minor just because they're "white collar" just shows how morally bankrupt your worldview is. I fully expect you had no such belief prior to Trump's candidacy as the vast majority of his supporters were "conservative" prior to the MAGA movement and had strong views on law enforcement, Russia's regime and other coherent policy positions. Those are now out the window as you cater to the whims of an unstable man whose views offer no insight and who insists on complete fealty even when endorsing positions that were the opposite of those held just the week before. You're in a cult of personality.

6 hours ago, Roo Island said:

Kamala is a way better choice than the convicted criminal and conman Trump. N comparison.

The "choice" you get with Kamala is the same people running the country for the next 4 years (or more) as the ones who are running the country now. Of course Kamala is just another puppet.

Quote from Uri Bezmenov:

Stop selling the rope that hangs you.

5 minutes ago, 300sd said:

The "choice" you get with Kamala is the same people running the country for the next 4 years (or more) as the ones who are running the country now. Of course Kamala is just another puppet.

Quote from Uri Bezmenov:

Stop selling the rope that hangs you.

And America is already liberal enough to anyone here still sane. Alot of insane posters here of course, fortunately most arent American and dont have a vote

A Democratic pundit was on German TV (DW) and the best she could say was "she wasn't as bad compared to her previous interviews".  Of course the DW interviewer did not push any further and let the Dem drone on about how she will be a great president etc, etc. In the end it might not matter I think most voters have made up their minds and the election will be close. In 2016 Hilary was disliked by many across party lines but I don't sense the same level of dislike in Kamala.  This might be enough for her to squeak by.  It looks the strategy is "less is more".  That is one interview, one debate and one news conference.  So far this has worked.  

7 hours ago, Hanaguma said:

If these are "bombshells", if this is Kamala at her best, then Trump has nothing to worry about. A very gentle Dana Bash gave her trouble over the course of a grand total of about 20 minutes' time.  She will wilt in a debate.

Can't wait for the debate. Harris is underrated by MAGA. Here's a clip of a lying conman dodging and evading. Harris will eat his lunch. 

 

 

5 minutes ago, sqwakvfr said:

A Democratic pundit was on German TV (DW) and the best she could say was "she wasn't as bad compared to her previous interviews".  Of course the DW interviewer did not push any further and let the Dem drone on about how she will be a great president etc, etc. In the end it might not matter I think most voters have made up their minds and the election will be close. In 2016 Hilary was disliked by many across party lines but I don't sense the same level of dislike in Kamala.  This might be enough for her to squeak by.  It looks the strategy is "less is more".  That is one interview, one debate and one news conference.  So far this has worked.  

Its like liberals are hoping that by not freely speaking her mind Kamala will deceive Americans into voting for someone clearly unqualified for the job

no link to the interview?

9 hours ago, HappyExpat57 said:

Seriously? A MAGA cultist bringing up mental sharpness?

 

And why aren't we all harping on the oldest man EVER running for president NOW?  Hmmm?

Democrats 

Flame leading to bickering has been removed also replies

3 hours ago, Patong2021 said:

What "bombshells"?  The Democrat nominees stayed on script, were neither controversial, nor charismatic. All in all, it is exactly what was needed: Low key, and calm.  

 

The Trump collective are grasping at anything and nothing, because the Democrat nominees gave them nothing.  Yes, candidate Harris changed her political positions on some issues like fracking. What's wrong with doing that, you know, listening to the views of others, of the  voters and  changing to better represent their concerns? The Trump collective is upset because she changed some of her positions. Well, isn't that what a  good representative of the people should do?

 

 

 

and what about her suddenly saying she'd build a border wall? after slating trumps and then cancelling it and leaving an open border for 3.5 years

That was not an interview - that was a puff piece by CNN on behalf of the Democrat Party.

Only an idiot could not see the difference between that 'scripted interview' and the recent one the same 'reporter' did with JD Vance. 

Many of us, who have lived long enough, probably yearn for the days when politicians, while contemptible in some ways, at least seemed to be guided by deep principles, whether you agreed with them or not.

Think of Golda Meir, Indira Ghandi, Margaret Thatcher, Nelson Mandela, Kwame Nkrumah, Churchill...we can all add to the list.  But how embarrassingly those names indicate our present impoverishment in the world of politics.

Geez ... the left thinks that interview was a success 

 

The also believe the last 3+ years of the crap economy & wars are good thing ... nuff said

34 minutes ago, TroubleandGrumpy said:

That was not an interview - that was a puff piece by CNN on behalf of the Democrat Party.

Only an idiot could not see the difference between that 'scripted interview' and the recent one the same 'reporter' did with JD Vance. 

pre recorded too

I thought it was interesting when Ms. Bash asked about Harris and Trump never having met in person.

 

Of course, they would have during the peaceful transfer-of-power in January 2021.

 

But Trump, in addition to inciting an insurrection and stealing classified documents, petulantly took his ball and ran home. Sore loser.

 

Trump is throwing a wrench into what is usually a seamless transfer of power

 

By refusing to meet face to face with President-elect Joe Biden or attend the swearing-in Wednesday at the Capitol building that his supporters stormed on Jan. 6, Trump is attempting one last departing snub of Biden after repeatedly failing to overturn the November election results.

 

https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2021-01-20/trump-disrupts-seamless-transfer-of-power

 

 

1 hour ago, blazes said:

Many of us, who have lived long enough, probably yearn for the days when politicians, while contemptible in some ways, at least seemed to be guided by deep principles, whether you agreed with them or not.

Think of Golda Meir, Indira Ghandi, Margaret Thatcher, Nelson Mandela, Kwame Nkrumah, Churchill...we can all add to the list.  But how embarrassingly those names indicate our present impoverishment in the world of politics.

And Starmer has had the Thatcher painting taken down in number 10 as he feels uncomfortable with it ...He will soon know how uncomfortable things are going to get for him 

5 hours ago, frank83628 said:

bombshells like this.....?

 

https://x.com/PapiTrumpo/status/1829587452593352994

 

What "bombshells"? Lol. It was a pre-recorded realtively soft interview. Kamala even struggled with the rather mild questioning of her flip flops  and lack of political backbone.

 

Can you imagine this woman facing Putin, Xi or Kim Il Jung? Well the latter would be easier, since America has an important alliance with the republic of North Korea according to Harris. That was the real bombshell. 😂

11 hours ago, stoner said:

 

too funny....you supported an old man AS president. too funny indeed. or is that ironic.

 

before you come back with the usual trumper bla bla bla. just because someone disagrees with you does not make them a trump fan. 

 

disclaimer. yep still not a trump fan no matter what the hateful 8 may tell you. 

Only supported him because the option was horrible.

 

P.s. my post wasn't directed to you. Not sure why you replied

7 hours ago, mdr224 said:

The funny thing is that biden gave the dems the best shot of winning

That doesn't seem to be the case. Look at the polls

6 hours ago, 300sd said:

The "choice" you get with Kamala is the same people running the country for the next 4 years (or more) as the ones who are running the country now. Of course Kamala is just another puppet.

Quote from Uri Bezmenov:

Stop selling the rope that hangs you.

Life's been great the past 4 years. Especially not having to read about all the bs Trump pulls.

4 hours ago, frank83628 said:

and what about her suddenly saying she'd build a border wall? after slating trumps and then cancelling it and leaving an open border for 3.5 years

Link?

22 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Yuge success!

Did we watch the same scripted interview. She just lied and why was her sidekick there . Just to cut the time down on her babbling answers. 28  minute interview padded out to 1 hour by the Camala News Network

2 hours ago, Cameroni said:

 

What "bombshells"? Lol. It was a pre-recorded realtively soft interview. Kamala even struggled with the rather mild questioning of her flip flops  and lack of political backbone.

 

Can you imagine this woman facing Putin, Xi or Kim Il Jung? Well the latter would be easier, since America has an important alliance with the republic of North Korea according to Harris. That was the real bombshell. 😂

Sure I can imagine it.

No being a poodle. 

No being a traitor.

No admiration of barbaric dictators.

No love letters.