3 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

To what end? 

To show that you aren't just posting BS with no basis in fact.  Or are you?

43 minutes ago, heybruce said:

To show that you aren't just posting BS with no basis in fact.  Or are you?

Who could I show that to? Certainly not you, been there, done that. 

 

 

 

 

6 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Who could I show that to? Certainly not you, been there, done that. 

Another empty evidence-free claim. You've still got nothing.

5 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

You need to provide proof that the Russians are blackmailing Trump.

 

This from the start of World News.

Any alleged factual claims must be supported by a valid link to an approved credible source.

Your loving some Trump there aren't you 

5 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

You need to provide proof that the Russians are blackmailing Trump.

 

This from the start of World News.

Any alleged factual claims must be supported by a valid link to an approved credible source.

Here's 1 of many articles 

 

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/07/mueller-testifies-russia-blackmail-leverage-trump.html

3 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Who could I show that to? Certainly not you, been there, done that. 

 

Reality check:

 

I asked you "Could you identify some of these irregularities that seemed to favor Biden?" after you posted that the 2020 election irregularities seemed to favor Biden. 

 

By replying with "been there, done that." you seem to be acknowledging that you have no credible examples.

23 hours ago, heybruce said:

Reality check:

 

I asked you "Could you identify some of these irregularities that seemed to favor Biden?" after you posted that the 2020 election irregularities seemed to favor Biden. 

 

By replying with "been there, done that." you seem to be acknowledging that you have no credible examples.

No, I am merely acknowledging that putting a lot of time and effort into gathering up the information would be a waste of time.

 

The biggest would be that (I think) mail-in ballots overwhelming favored President Biden, which is not a surprise, but that the rejection rate plummeted. 

 

 

34 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

No, I am merely acknowledging that putting a lot of time and effort into gathering up the information would be a waste of time.

 

The biggest would be that (I think) mail-in ballots overwhelming favored President Biden, which is not a surprise, but that the rejection rate plummeted. 

 

 

Its worthwhile spending a couple of minutes fact checking when making claims that you then can't back up.

 

Study: No partisan benefit from mail voting in 2020 election

The research is only the latest in a years-long number of studies finding no partisan benefit to mail voting. But it also draws the conclusion that making it easier to vote did not increase voting levels because voters were already highly motivated to participate in the 2020 contest.

 

Even As Trump Denounces Vote By Mail, GOP In Florida And Elsewhere Relies On It

 

 

42 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

No, I am merely acknowledging that putting a lot of time and effort into gathering up the information would be a waste of time.

 

The biggest would be that (I think) mail-in ballots overwhelming favored President Biden, which is not a surprise, but that the rejection rate plummeted. 

 

 

This has been debunked, same as the other irregularities you did not have time to gather.

Comment on moderation + replies have been removed.

 

A reported inflammatory post also removed along with a reply to it.

On 4/3/2023 at 3:12 AM, Yellowtail said:

No, I am merely acknowledging that putting a lot of time and effort into gathering up the information would be a waste of time.

 

The biggest would be that (I think) mail-in ballots overwhelming favored President Biden, which is not a surprise, but that the rejection rate plummeted. 

 

 

The Democratic Party, the party that took Covid seriously, encouraged its voters to vote by mail and be careful when filling out the ballots.  The Republican Party, led by Trump, told voters to go to the polls on election day.  The results were predictable and predicted.  How is that evidence of election fraud?

This is a "BULL <deleted> POLL:" Donald Trump's odds of winning the 2024 presidential election have not been hurt by his indictment, but rather the chances of him making it back into the White House have improved, bookmakers have said.

35 minutes ago, Dan747 said:

This is a "BULL <deleted> POLL:" Donald Trump's odds of winning the 2024 presidential election have not been hurt by his indictment, but rather the chances of him making it back into the White House have improved, bookmakers have said.

This is short sighted.

He was just charged with 34 FELONIES and this set of crimes is much less serious than what is coming later in Georgia and federally. 

Also of course getting nominated in a bizarro maga fascist dominated party is a completely different thing than the general election where Trump would need to get center right suburban white woman, independents, etc.

He's a loser. He keeps losing for the republican party. He's their burden. Indeed their biggest loser.

Also consider this.

 

CNN Poll: Majority of Americans approve of Trump indictment (richmond.com)

 

Also consider the violent mass riots that Trump was clearly inciting did not happen! He's playing the I am like Jesus card and only the ultra magas are buying it and it turns out they don't care enough to take the bait into action. Of course there will be incidents but the reporters in New York way outnumbered to protesters. The guy has peaked. We're watching his downfall. (Hopefully.)

 

 

7 hours ago, heybruce said:

The Democratic Party, the party that took Covid seriously, encouraged its voters to vote by mail and be careful when filling out the ballots.  The Republican Party, led by Trump, told voters to go to the polls on election day.  The results were predictable and predicted.  How is that evidence of election fraud?

Did I say anything about fraud? 

On 4/2/2023 at 3:37 AM, heybruce said:

Reality check:

 

I asked you "Could you identify some of these irregularities that seemed to favor Biden?" after you posted that the 2020 election irregularities seemed to favor Biden. 

 

By replying with "been there, done that." you seem to be acknowledging that you have no credible examples.

 

On 4/3/2023 at 3:12 AM, Yellowtail said:

No, I am merely acknowledging that putting a lot of time and effort into gathering up the information would be a waste of time.

 

The biggest would be that (I think) mail-in ballots overwhelming favored President Biden, which is not a surprise, but that the rejection rate plummeted. 

 

 

 

52 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Did I say anything about fraud? 

It seems you have a short memory, or are you conceding that the election "irregularities" were not evidence of fraud.  I provided the relevant posts and replies to jog your memory.

35 minutes ago, heybruce said:

It seems you have a short memory, or are you conceding that the election "irregularities" were not evidence of fraud.  I provided the relevant posts and replies to jog your memory.

I am conceding nothing. I do not now, nor have I ever claimed that election "irregularities" were the same as election fraud. 

 

Anything else? 

1 hour ago, Yellowtail said:

I am conceding nothing. I do not now, nor have I ever claimed that election "irregularities" were the same as election fraud. 

 

Anything else? 

Ok how's this:

 

The Democratic Party, the party that took Covid seriously, encouraged its voters to vote by mail and be careful when filling out the ballots.  The Republican Party, led by Trump, told voters to go to the polls on election day.  The results were predictable and predicted.  How is that evidence of election fraud irregularities?

 

Any comments?

1 hour ago, Yellowtail said:

I am conceding nothing. I do not now, nor have I ever claimed that election "irregularities" were the same as election fraud. 

 

Anything else? 

How are they not?

I would love to see Trump be the president again.

 

Much better than that puppet Biden who is just slightly below that peanut farmer puppet Carter.

Just now, dingdongrb said:

I would love to see Trump be the president again.

 

Much better than that puppet Biden who is just slightly below that peanut farmer puppet Carter.

Stay classy.

So who is Biden's puppet master?

10 hours ago, Jingthing said:

He was just charged with 34 FELONIES and this set of crimes is much less serious than what is coming later in Georgia and federally. 

If I recall OJ was charged with two murders. How did that work out?

 

Biden needs to go, he has not done a single thing positive for the USA except to go to bed at night.

On 3/29/2023 at 5:43 AM, onthedarkside said:

The majority of Americans do not want former President Donald Trump to be elected in 2024 (...)

Interesting. Wonder, how this will impact a possible nomination by the Republicans.

1 hour ago, dingdongrb said:

I would love to see Trump be the president again.

 

Much better than that puppet Biden who is just slightly below that peanut farmer puppet Carter.

Is that your idea of a coherent, rational and persuasive post?  Epic fail.

1 hour ago, dingdongrb said:

If I recall OJ was charged with two murders. How did that work out?

 

Biden needs to go, he has not done a single thing positive for the USA except to go to bed at night.

Infrastructure bill, preparing the world for Russia's invasion of Ukraine, supporting Ukraine, strengthening NATO, alliances with the UK, Australia, India and now the Philippines to contain China, etc.

43 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

In irregularity you forgot to mention the word "electoral", not arguably germane to the topic. Here is a reference to electoral irregularity, the very foirst entry which comes up in a search for electoral irregularity.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electoral_fraud

 

Fraud Detection, Electoral

 

To enlarge the scope and efficiency of election observation missions, the emerging field of election forensics evaluates, exclusively on a data-driven basis, to which extent a specific type of electoral irregularity might have affected the results of an election

 

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327018767_Fraud_Detection_Electoral

 

 

Are you claiming that electoral irregularities are the same thing as electoral fraud? 

 

Again, they are not. 

 

Some off topic bickering posts and replies have been removed

2 hours ago, StayinThailand2much said:

Interesting. Wonder, how this will impact a possible nomination by the Republicans.

It won't. 

They can't quit him.

1 hour ago, Jingthing said:

It won't. 

They can't quit him.

Every Republican I know, would rather he was not the nominee, but if he is, they will hold their nose and vote for him.

 

On 4/3/2023 at 2:12 PM, Yellowtail said:

The biggest would be that (I think) mail-in ballots overwhelming favored President Biden, which is not a surprise, but that the rejection rate plummeted. 

Looks like you've been drinking the Koolaid..

Why So Few Absentee Ballots Were Rejected In 2020

 "Election-administration experts cite several factors, but a big one was that voters submitted their absentee ballots early. That’s important because, in a normal election, the number-one reason that absentee ballots are not counted is that they arrive too late. But in 2020, several states reported steep dropoffs in the share of absentees received after the deadline."

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/why-so-few-absentee-ballots-were-rejected-in-2020/