Jump to content

Supreme Court Upholds Death Penalty for Ex-Pheu Thai MP Banyin Tangpakorn


webfact

Recommended Posts

dFQROr7oWzulq5Fa4VRQ3K3XgY68cZIEwGLMlFRa1lJLTaDfhSnosrkxxNrf8va0rZj.webp

 

The Supreme Court of Thailand has upheld the death penalty for Banyin Tangpakorn, a former Pheu Thai MP and cabinet member, marking a decisive end to a high-profile and grisly murder case. 

 

Banyin was found guilty of orchestrating the premeditated murder of Chuwong Sae Tang, a wealthy construction magnate, in a staged car accident in Bangkok's Prawet district in 2015. The court determined that Banyin, who was driving the car with Chuwong seated beside him, deliberately crashed the vehicle into a roadside tree to cover up the homicide.

 

The ruling not only reaffirmed the Appeals Court’s earlier sentencing but also closed a dark chapter involving the former police lieutenant colonel. Shifted from his role as a law enforcer to that of a lawbreaker, Banyin used his insider knowledge to carry out and disguise his crime, a factor that played heavily against him in court.

 

Chuwong's murder was particularly shocking due to Banyin's calculated efforts to stage the scene as an accidental crash. The initial investigation faced numerous challenges, given Banyin's sophisticated attempt at a cover-up. However, evidence eventually revealed the premeditated nature of the crime, leading to his conviction.

 

Banyin's criminal activities weren't confined to this single incident. Before his 2020 arrest, he had been implicated in another deceptive car accident in 1991, where he survived but a woman lost her life. This case, however, didn't lead to a conviction. Furthermore, Banyin was also accused of involvement in the 2020 murder of a judge's brother, adding to his notoriety.

 

In the wake of his sentencing, the former MP attempted suicide in prison, underscoring the severity of his situation. The Supreme Court’s decision underscores the gravity of his actions and serves as a stark reminder of the ramifications of abusing power.

 

Picture courtesy:Thai Rath

 

news-logo-btm.jpg

-- 2024-06-28

 

Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, webfact said:

Banyin's criminal activities weren't confined to this single incident. Before his 2020 arrest, he had been implicated in another deceptive car accident in 1991, where he survived but a woman lost her life. This case, however, didn't lead to a conviction. Furthermore, Banyin was also accused of involvement in the 2020 murder of a judge's brother, adding to his notoriety

Wow... 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, prakhonchai nick said:

Appeals should not be necessary. All murderers deserve to die, regardless of who they are or who they know. 9 years after the event what a complete farce!!!!!!!!!

ALL appeals should be heard - just quicker is all. You seem to be the sort of person lopping off someone's head before the ink is dry on the appeal due to new evidence form !

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, prakhonchai nick said:

Appeals should not be necessary. All murderers deserve to die, regardless of who they are or who they know. 9 years after the event what a complete farce!!!!!!!!!

 

No. All appeals must be heard, especially if a country is so backwards as to have capital punishment still. Miscarriages of justice happen. Or perhaps you think that we should take a leaf out of the Chinese court system book and have mobile death vans stationed outside every kangaroo court.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RichardColeman said:

ALL appeals should be heard - just quicker is all. You seem to be the sort of person lopping off someone's head before the ink is dry on the appeal due to new evidence form !

 

Appeals should be heard only in cases where there is doubt or circumstantial evidence, anyone caught in the act of murder and convicted, should be executed within the month.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

so he was 5 years on the run ? or not worried at least to be cought...

 

when some people can borrow watches worth millions from dead friends, criminals on the run getting the red carpet and VIP threatment,  where a high up can have his own gambling ring and get away with it,  when a drug officer can plastic bag criminals and get millions of worth of cars and houses.... is anyone surprised?

  • Sad 1
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, prakhonchai nick said:

Appeals should not be necessary. All murderers deserve to die, regardless of who they are or who they know. 9 years after the event what a complete farce!!!!!!!!!

Yes ,if they have enough evidence ,for sure .

This is an open and shut case this is the 3rd dead/murder he's  involved with/or Done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.










×
×
  • Create New...