4 minutes ago, mommysboy said:

No 'good one' no 'bad one'.

Well, Sinovac is still a low quality vaccine.

No mention of the CCSA report that since July 1 in 3 covid deaths are with Thai vaccinated with Sinovac (and to a much lesser extent AZ).

Maybe not as good as some but still provides good protection against serious illness and death vs Delta. 
 

https://fortune.com/2021/08/31/china-covid-vaccine-sinovac-sinopharm-delta-variant-effective/

You have been scolded by big brother. Watch out! 

8 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

Well, Sinovac is still a low quality vaccine.

No, it's not.  It met WHO standards.

7 minutes ago, SmartyMarty said:

No mention of the CCSA report that since July 1 in 3 covid deaths are with Thai vaccinated with Sinovac (and to a much lesser extent AZ).

Well, these are the only 2 vaccines to have been used in Thailand.

 

The AZ is actually the best of all at preventing deaths, but no covid vaccine can be 100% effective.

3 minutes ago, mommysboy said:

No, it's not.  It met WHO standards.

How much was that $

"They pointed out they were the first country to come to Thailand's assistance in the vaccine fight against Covid-19."

 

They make it sound like they were donations....far from it, this Sinocrap actually costs 3-4 times the price of AZ or Pfizer!

4 minutes ago, mommysboy said:

Well, these are the only 2 vaccines to have been used in Thailand.

Sorry but Sinopharm and Pfizer are being used too

2 hours ago, webfact said:

Every single dose of Sinovac was an example of the friendship, solidarity and help that the Chinese people have for Thailand.

So they gave it for FREE , sounds like it. well the Covid was a free gift.....

regards Worgeordie

 

Yet more communist clap trap from the corrupt idiots in peking.

They haven't the decency to apologize to the world and won't allow unhindered transparency of the events in Wuhan, boo hoo!

4 minutes ago, mommysboy said:

No, it's not.  It met WHO standards.

Haha.  Good one.  ????

2 minutes ago, worgeordie said:

So they gave it for FREE , sounds like it. well the Covid was a free gift.....

regards Worgeordie

 

They would like us believe that but I believe the Thai Govt paid USD$9.00 a shot for it as reported in these pages a few days ago.

2 hours ago, webfact said:

Sinovac is safe, efficacious and they guarantee its quality.

Just wait until all the people who've been protected by this miraculous product try to get a Western vaccine passport. The WHO (aka CHO, or Chinese Health Organisation) might have approved it, but the relevant American, British and European regulators have not done so and, until the Chinese release the full details of their clinical trials, they are very unlikley to do so.

No, Sinovac it is not a "low quality vaccine." It's a vaccine and seems to have done its job very well in China. There are others that are touted to be more effective, but the figures I see tell me that Sinovac is effective. It works. That's all you need to know. 

If you have a choice of vaccines, then you might consider another vaccine. But, if Sinovac is the only vaccine available to you, don't wait -- take it!

 

Any port in a storm.

Sinovac it is NOT a low quality vaccine.

 

It's just not as high quality as all of the others.

 

The CCP still hasn't published peer reviewed efficacy and safety data. They didn't bother to follow the rules and the normal behaviors that normal companies in normal countries do. They just told their population they had to take it. And anyone that wants to go to China. And then they wonder why people questions the efficacy and safety.   

3 hours ago, webfact said:

They pointed out they were the first country to come to Thailand's assistance in the vaccine fight against Covid-19.

...................and the the people to give Thailand the disease in the first place !

 

 

 

1 hour ago, mommysboy said:

Yes, social media and ill informed posters have a lot to answer for.

 

Sinovac is a useful vaccine- because of its mild side effects it may even be better in some circumstances.  Certainly, it could be argued that it is the best option for youngsters, since they don't really need a strong vaccine like Pfizer or AZ.

Good lord

In fairness, Sinovac was the first vaccine available here. At the time it was better than nothing. But it was purchased, not donated as the posted article implies. The consumers are entitled to form their own opinions as to whether they got good value, and whether it makes sense to buy more. So give credit where due, while continuing to search for better alternatives.

 

I am not l.listening to any Chinese virologist or scientist.

 

I will be checking my Facebook this afternoon and get back to everybody with the FACTS!

10 minutes ago, pjmorton said:

In fairness, Sinovac was the first vaccine available here. At the time it was better than nothing. But it was purchased, not donated as the posted article implies. The consumers are entitled to form their own opinions as to whether they got good value, and whether it makes sense to buy more. So give credit where due, while continuing to search for better alternatives.

 

https://www.healthline.com/health/astrazeneca-vs-sinovac#effectiveness

 

Neither of these vaccines has been approved for regular or emergency use in the United States yet. Numerous trials are underway and applications could be presented to the Food & Drug Administration (FDA) in the future to add to the nation’s arsenal against COVID-19. Both vaccines are also being reviewed by the World Health Organization.

	AstraZeneca	Sinovac
Official name	AZD1222	CoronaVac
Effectiveness	76%	56%–65%Trusted Source
Dosage	2 doses, 28 days apart	2 doses, 21 days apart
Storage	standard refrigeration	standard refrigeration
Type	chimpanzee adenovirus	inactivated virus
Approval status	approved for use in Brazil and issued an emergency use authorization in UK, EU, and other countries	approved for use in China and issued an emergency use authorization in Turkey, Mexico, Brazil, and other countries
U.S. availability	300 million doses owned, but not approved for use	none

 

4 minutes ago, Scouse123 said:

I am not l.listening to any Chinese virologist or scientist.

 

I will be checking my Facebook this afternoon and get back to everybody with the FACTS!

Why not Dr Google?

2 hours ago, mfd101 said:

but nothing's perfect.

 

i am

24 minutes ago, RichardColeman said:

...................and the the people to give Thailand the disease in the first place !

 

 

 

Not just Thailand, it was shared around. 

Thailand just decided to buy excess stock from China at inflated prices no doubt mutually lining multiple pockets.

3 hours ago, mtls2005 said:

Sinovac it is NOT a low quality vaccine

 

Yea, they need some help on messaging.

 

Help: Sinovac is a HIGH quality vaccine

 

 

 

Thank you comrade. Your social credit has just gone up 10 points.

????

3 hours ago, webfact said:

They pointed out they were the first country to come to Thailand's assistance in the vaccine fight against Covid-19.

 

They failed to mention that they generously did so after Thailand became the first country to be infected by their citizens.

The CCP should go and whine about it in Countries that don't except their second hand product.

Stick to what you’re good at, China.—worldwide pandemics.

12 minutes ago, RJRS1301 said:

Why not Dr Google?

Dr search engines can and are manipulated