Jump to content

Thailand seeks to slash quarantine period for visitors


snoop1130

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, James105 said:

and focuses instead of numbers of positive tests

Actually there was a shift a few weeks ago from the focus on new infections to 'recoveries'.... probably more to minimize concern wrt hospitals. I can certainly appreciate concern with respect to reducing rules etc for quarantine/ test requirements for visiting foreign tourists..... I  worry about the paperwork they present......in the early days too many test results were actually fake paperwork.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Upnotover said:

 

"Halving" obviously means something else in these parts.

.

 

Obviously, with the Thai's acute knowledge of American history and Longfellow's Paul Revere, they were thinking "one if by air, two if by sea," but the reporter was a half-wit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those vaccinated = no quarantine at all
Not vaccinated = no entry into Thailand
Simple as that - provided that all those who wanted, got meanwhile vaccinated.

The last sentence is the problem of Thailand, they've been d1cking around far too long with who buys where how many jabs - a totally uncoordinated mess, like most other things here. 

While Anutin and Sudarat are still word-fighting over who does/does not ...... other countries enjoy the overflow tourism of all those, who wanted to go to Thailand and now ended up in Southern Turkey, Caribbean, Central America etc. Europe is open and doing thriving business again, without the guided leadership of some 1d1ots from the political arena! 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Rocking Robert said:

The USA has 56% of the population vaccinated yet they Jampacked football stadiums by the millions every weekend shoulder to shoulder without masks what’s up with that

And they have well over 100,000 new positives and a couple of thousand deaths, every day.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, RJRS1301 said:

It is not about keeping it out, it is about controlling the spread, and not overwhelming an already inadequate hospital system

 

That' would be solved by not sending everyone that sniffles to a two week sentence.

However, that's not going to happen when their profits from doing so are 14,200,000,000 since beginning of year.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Upnotover said:

 

"Halving" obviously means something else in these parts.

You are barking/bashing up the wrong tree. The proposal as reported in the main news clearly states  7 days for fully vaccinated people taking tests. The article forgets to mention this part. I suggest you direct your arithmetic grievances to Reuters.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Come t

32 minutes ago, scorecard said:

And they have well over 100,000 new positives and a couple of thousand deaths, every day.

They pay the hospitals and clinics large sums for diagnosing it as  covid related.  $37,000 per.

No wonder everything is covid.

CDC states that only 5% of all deaths are FROM covid.

  • Sad 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, pepi2005 said:

Cutting the quarantine stay (if we consider this concept even as useful at all for a potential infection with a virus with such a ridiculously small risk for non-risk groups ????) in half for vaccinated people - isn't that pretty silly and just the opposite of the rational approach? Sorry for being blunt.

 

But at this point, anyone who still doesn't know that vaccinated people can carry even multiples of the viral load than unvaccinated, can't be taken seriously.

 

Vaccinated people are not "safe" for others, but arguably even more dangerous, as during an infection, their symptoms are suppressed while they may feel over-confident and spread the virus for days or weeks after leaving the quarantine. They should allow unvaccinated (who usually show symptoms 3-4 days after an infection at latest) to leave after 5-6 days if symptom-free (again: if we consider a quarantine for this virus as useful at all), but keep the vaccinated in for at least 1-2 weeks just to make sure, and also test them for their viral loads extensively.

 

You forget that the unvaccinated are up to 10 times more likely to be infected.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Dart12 said:

Come t

They pay the hospitals and clinics large sums for diagnosing it as  covid related.  $37,000 per.

No wonder everything is covid.

CDC states that only 5% of all deaths are FROM covid.

That’s 1500 deaths a day that are preventable, via vaccination.
 

the other deaths are not. Big difference.

 

More to the point, if murders represent only 5% of all deaths, should murderers go free?

Edited by Danderman123
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, richard_smith237 said:

Common sense would see the following... 

 

- Vaccinated arrivals no quarantine 

- Pre-flight PCR test requirement

- Arrival PCR test requirement (24 hr home / hotel quarantine until negative result is known)

 

Only until 70% of the population if vaccinated with an ‘effective’ vaccine (i.e. not Sinpharm / Sinovac, but with Pfizer, Moderna - vaccines of >90% efficacy) 

 

- Non vaccinated individuals (with out a medical certificate that they have a vaccine allergy etc) still quarantine (thats their choice). 

 

 

 

 

Correct, perfect said????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...