Circumcision

[Sparktrader]

1 minute ago, In the jungle said:

When I saw the title Circumcision I was fearing it was a new requirement in some immigration law.

 

 

I'm ok then, 90 visa exempt, uncircumcised get 5 days

 

 

 

 

[MrMuddle]

55 minutes ago, OneMoreFarang said:

In principle I think that is a good idea.

But there seems to be one important difference. If it is done on a child, then is almost doesn't hurt.

If it's done with an adult, it hurts a lot and for weeks. At least that is what a friend told me who had to do it for medical reasons.

I was circumcised in my early teens, was asleep and didn't feel a thing. Don't remember any pain afterwards either.

[Jingthing]

14 minutes ago, MrMuddle said:

I was circumcised in my early teens, was asleep and didn't feel a thing. Don't remember any pain afterwards either.

I really don't think that's typical. There usually would be pain involved and afterwards for I don't know how many days while healing. With babies too but they don't remember it later.

[BangkokReady]

2 hours ago, Sparktrader said:

More hygenic.

Hardly.  Just wash the thing.  Doesn't seem worth it for the loss of feeling.

[Jingthing]

29 minutes ago, ThailandRyan said:

Everyone has a view so leave it be and stop trying to convince others that the act of doing so is despicable.

 

The OP Author asked for information not a debate.

https://www.mymeditravel.com/circumcision-procedures-in-thailand

Of course but with a divisive topic like this, pretty much unavoidable. 

 

So here goes -- you don't miss what you don't know. 

[BangkokReady]

1 hour ago, 1FinickyOne said:

ahh, just trimming a small unnecessary piece...  wouldn't hurt you either. 

It's not the pain, it's more the loss of sensation.  And the fact that there is literally no benefit, other than pleasing other people who have had it done.

[BangkokReady]

2 hours ago, richard_smith237 said:

Those were perhaps the reason in the past...

It's more that those are the lies of the past still used today.

 

People will reel off some supposed facts about urinary tract infections, or some such nonsense.  In countries where circumcision is not common, there are no problems whatsoever.

[BangkokReady]

49 minutes ago, stoner said:

chicks dig it.

Chicks don't care.

[BangkokReady]

2 hours ago, 1FinickyOne said:

just trimming a small unnecessary piece

The foreskin is very necessary.  That's why it's there.

 

Why not have your eyelids removed?  They don't do anything!  ????

[Mac Mickmanus]

23 minutes ago, Sparktrader said:

After child birth it's nothing

I would think that very few people give birth to a Child and also get circumcised , so not many could make the comparison 

[Jingthing]

The need for surgery for phimosis is not too uncommon.

 

Phimosis - Wikipedia

[BangkokReady]

44 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

being a medical problem with not cutting

Almost non-existent.  Not going to happen.

[MrMuddle]

Just now, BangkokReady said:

It's not the pain, it's more the loss of sensation.  And the fact that there is literally no benefit, other than pleasing other people who have had it done.

I didn't have any noticeable loss of sensation, and the benefit to me was that after sex, the foreskin no longer stayed back, behind the glans (the penis head), which was extremely painful to get back in place. This involved a clamp with spikes on it, that was used to pull the foreskin back in place.

[BangkokReady]

9 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

you don't miss what you don't know

Actually, a lot of guys seem to have an issue after being cut.  A lot will go crazy at intact people and insist that it's gross, women hate it, it stinks, etc..  Cognitive dissonance is the cause, because they are unhappy about having it done but cannot admit it.

[BangkokReady]

2 minutes ago, MrMuddle said:

I didn't have any noticeable loss of sensation, and the benefit to me was that after sex, the foreskin no longer stayed back, behind the glans (the penis head), which was extremely painful to get back in place. This involved a clamp with spikes on it, that was used to pull the foreskin back in place.

Well, with the greatest respect, you obviously had some sort of medical issue with your foreskin meaning that removal was preferable.  Not really applicable to the generality of the discussion at hand.  While you have my sympathy, of course.

[BangkokReady]

44 minutes ago, Sparktrader said:

Women like it, trust me

Women don't care.  In fact, not only can women enjoy being with an intact man because they get more pleasure from oral, they can also receive more stimulation during PIV from the foreskin. 

 

Besides, if they clam to prefer circumcised simply because it looks "neater", why the f would that be reason to have it cut off?

[JimmyJ]

Many infants have had serious injuries due to this unnecessary and cruel genital mutilation.

 

Babies born healthy need surgical correction???

 

 

[BangkokReady]

12 minutes ago, JimmyJ said:

 

It's always been about control of sexuality.  I've heard before it's some sort of bodily sacrifice for Jewish people.  The rest it likely comes from the removal of the foreskin to stop boys from masturbating.

 

Everything justifying it now simply comes from that.  And people that cannot cope with being cut and needing others to get it too.

[Jingthing]

13 minutes ago, JimmyJ said:

Many infants have had serious injuries due to this unnecessary and cruel genital mutilation.

It well may have been historically (in the US male masturbation used to be good for an invitation to an insane asylum) but that's a moot point in deciding today.

Yes there is a key pleasure part missing that the male will never miss because never known, but cut men get plenty enough pleasure and there have been studies to suggest they tend to get MORE pleasure from areas other than the penis, and in my view, that's a good thing. 

[Sparktrader]

24 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

It's not the pain, it's more the loss of sensation.  And the fact that there is literally no benefit, other than pleasing other people who have had it done.

No loss of anything

[Mac Mickmanus]

2 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

The rest it likely comes from the removal of the foreskin to stop boys from masturbating.

Would have been difficult at the time anyway when the rules first came into place , considering they didn't have Pornhub or Readers wives magazine back then 

[Sparktrader]

19 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

I would think that very few people give birth to a Child and also get circumcised , so not many could make the comparison 

The child silly. It went thru that. Removing useless skin is nothing.

.

[Mac Mickmanus]

1 minute ago, Sparktrader said:

The child silly. It went thru that. Removing useless skin is nothing.

.

As long as its your own skin .

No one should have the right to chop other peoples skin off 

[Jingthing]

Probably best to just agree to disagree. Nobody is going to have their mind changed about this here.

[BangkokReady]

6 minutes ago, Sparktrader said:

No loss of anything

1, You have sexual sensation in your foreskin - you lose this if you cut it off.  2, Your foreskin moisturises and protects the glans, removal means the glans will be less protected and become less sensitive as a result.

 

[carlyai]

If you can get the moderator to move it to the Health Forum as Cheryl will probably know where to go.

A pediactric dr maybe?

Think they have a pediactric department at Khon Kean University Hospital (After Hours Clinic). ????

[BangkokReady]

9 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

they tend to get MORE pleasure from areas other than the penis, and in my view, that's a good thing.

Can you expand on that?

[Sparktrader]

4 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

1, You have sexual sensation in your foreskin - you lose this if you cut it off.  2, Your foreskin moisturises and protects the glans, removal means the glans will be less protected and become less sensitive as a result.

 

Sounds gross. No thanks. 

[Sparktrader]

5 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

As long as its your own skin .

No one should have the right to chop other peoples skin off 

So leave the cord attached then?

[onthedarkside]

A trolling post, a flame and a disallowed YouTube video post have been removed, along with some ensuing replies.

 

See the forum's rule:

 

"in factual areas such as but not limited to news, current affairs and health topics, social media cannot be used unless it is from a credible news media source or a government agency, and must include a link to the original source.