Oh ! the SAD emoji is back Liverpool lou will be over the moon,

it was his favourite and used it extensively ........????   now just need

to get these emojis back so we can actually see what they are 

 

regards worgeordie

1 hour ago, Crossy said:

 

We are hoping (I know, I know), that the fact that "Nobody Knows" (QI fans will understand) will remove the satisfaction factor and actually reduce reaction trolling.

 

We shall see. The toys can be removed just as easily as they were reinstated.

It is getting as bad as the Thai government with so many emoji flip flops.

 

Yesterday it was bad, today it is OK, next week who knows?

I wonder how some members will take this news.

Now they will feel sad again when too many members laugh or are sad - and all without proper explanation why.

The horror!

 

I don't know why this expression just came to my mind. ????

 

3 hours ago, stoner said:

looks like they took away the who done it though. 

That is stupid AF

 

OMG how complicated can it be without doing so much fix fax thing about posting and doing a moderator job.

 

If I give an emoji, I want the person to know it was me, and if I get one my self, I think it is ok to know also. Especially when you know curtain individuals like to be serious or not, and therefor you know why you got it, or it is just someone having fun on your behalf.

 

55 minutes ago, Hummin said:

If I give an emoji, I want the person to know it was me, and if I get one my self, I think it is ok to know also. Especially when you know curtain individuals like to be serious or not, and therefor you know why you got it, or it is just someone having fun on your behalf.

 

Yeap...I agree.  Take responsibility for emojis given vs just more anonymous hiding behind the keyboard.  Let the receiver know who gave them. 

4 hours ago, ozimoron said:

I'll be reducing my time on this board and away from trolls who use emojis to stalk and annoy instead of contributing sensible and meaningful posts. 

 

I'd rather see all emojis gone instead of the shoe fight we have here now. 

That's a pity, you just need to pay it less heed.

 

I've had instances of the odd member seemingly upset with something I've said, then adding a laugh emoji to my every response in the topic, but it means little to me, and if it makes someone happy fine. Water off a duck's back.

5 hours ago, Crossy said:

 

 

Sorry, it was me, I couldn't resist.

 

But yes, it was, along with ha-ha. We shall see how it works out.

 

Surely we are allowed to use the 'ha-ha' emoji if we find a post actually funny/amusing? ???? ???? Now I'm trolling ????

4 hours ago, billd766 said:

It is getting as bad as the Thai government with so many emoji flip flops.

 

Yesterday it was bad, today it is OK, next week who knows?

Thank you. I like that post. It was funny.

 

There you go, three for the price of one!

2 hours ago, Stocky said:

That's a pity, you just need to pay it less heed.

 

I've had instances of the odd member seemingly upset with something I've said, then adding a laugh emoji to my every response in the topic, but it means little to me, and if it makes someone happy fine. Water off a duck's back.

Without limit? Really? There must be a limit somewhere after which you must find it slightly annoying. Then, weeks later it might progress beyond annoying. Are you saying that could never occur?

4 hours ago, Hummin said:

That is stupid AF

 

OMG how complicated can it be without doing so much fix fax thing about posting and doing a moderator job.

 

If I give an emoji, I want the person to know it was me, and if I get one my self, I think it is ok to know also. Especially when you know curtain individuals like to be serious or not, and therefor you know why you got it, or it is just someone having fun on your behalf.

 

I agree, but as somebody else said on this thread, it's probably designed to get more people posting comments rather than just emojis. If you can't let a poster know what you personally think of their comment with an emoji, you have to write something.

And I assume forums with more comments are more lucrative ????‍♂️

 

It's either that, or it's to protect those over sensitive people on here...

Off topic posts and replies to them have been removed.

 

Gentlemen, if you wish to have a one-to-one conversation please PM each other instead of derailing a topic.

12 hours ago, Jai Dee said:

I was the troll who just gave you a laughing emoji... 

 

Hmmm... I better go warn myself now... 

I don't reckon this is a laughing matter.

 

When you receive a laughing emoji (or sad or confused) from 'A' member for EACH and EVERY comment you make it is juvenile and antagonizing, it becomes annoying.

 

I assume now that these emoji's have become unrecognized, the stalkers may not offend anymore.

 

There are members that are chummy (school boy like), posting emoji's like, love, thanks etc. for their chums, this should put a stop to it, discontinue due to the unrecognized system.

 

This forum must be a nightmare to manage for the moderators. Each member gets offended but we all are different and we find different things offensive. At times I've been offended by a comment and reported the offense but the comment does not get removed. My thoughts are to get a broader demographic of people that can judge on what and what isn't offensive.

 

 

I don't have a lot of confidence that removing the names of emoji posters is a good idea. I won't know who is trolling me and who to put on ignore and I don't trust mods to do that job for me.

7 hours ago, CG1 Blue said:

I agree, but as somebody else said on this thread, it's probably designed to get more people posting comments rather than just emojis. If you can't let a poster know what you personally think of their comment with an emoji, you have to write something.

And I assume forums with more comments are more lucrative ????‍♂️

 

It's either that, or it's to protect those over sensitive people on here...

You can end up with a tread with alot of meaningless posts, where a emoji serve The same purpose, and less for those who want to read to scroll past.

 

It just take some few to behave, and a emoji might stop a few trolling posts and less work. 

 

To know who gives you an emoji, let you know if you should give a better answer, maybe consider your opinions, or make yourself better understood, or you know from before they just stalking you.

 

 

Excellent,  Game on.  

 

 

BTW. ICYDK some Netspeak abbreviations can convey some  similar feelings. If you stop them too, I will be thinking to myself  HS!  <deleted>!  I won't know whether to ROTFL or CMEO.

 

Anyway . GTG. HAND. 

 

 

Seems like those who gives out laughing emojis dont think big brother sees them ????

8 hours ago, ozimoron said:

Without limit? Really? There must be a limit somewhere after which you must find it slightly annoying. Then, weeks later it might progress beyond annoying. Are you saying that could never occur?

That is what moderation is for.

 

On the other hand making the emojis anonymous could be construed as an attempt to modify the way that users express opinions, which is not particularly the job of moderators. If I like, agree with or wish to thank someone for making a point in a discussion then I think they should be able to know that. 

6 hours ago, blackcab said:

Off topic posts and replies to them have been removed.

 

Gentlemen, if you wish to have a one-to-one conversation please PM each other instead of derailing a topic.

And ladies? ????

12 minutes ago, Thailand said:

And ladies? ????

And Disney characters like that famous mouse? 

51 minutes ago, phetphet said:

BTW. ICYDK some Netspeak abbreviations can convey some  similar feelings. If you stop them too, I will be thinking to myself  HS!  <deleted>!  I won't know whether to ROTFL or CMEO.

 

Anyway . GTG. HAND. 

 

 

Thats one easy way to get your post removed ! 

Would it be an idea for the Mods to explain as & when the re-instated emojis should be used.

The difference between LIKE, LOVE IT and THUMBS UP for example.

12 hours ago, ozimoron said:

Without limit? Really? There must be a limit somewhere after which you must find it slightly annoying. Then, weeks later it might progress beyond annoying. Are you saying that could never occur?

It's an internet forum, it's not my daily life, I can take it or leave it. I find it amusing rather than annoying, clearly it's the other person's skin I've got under, otherwise they wouldn't be doing it.

11 hours ago, CG1 Blue said:

I agree, but as somebody else said on this thread, it's probably designed to get more people posting comments rather than just emojis. If you can't let a poster know what you personally think of their comment with an emoji, you have to write something.

And I assume forums with more comments are more lucrative ????‍♂️

I think you are right.

3 hours ago, herfiehandbag said:

That is what moderation is for.

 

On the other hand making the emojis anonymous could be construed as an attempt to modify the way that users express opinions, which is not particularly the job of moderators. If I like, agree with or wish to thank someone for making a point in a discussion then I think they should be able to know that. 

That was my thumbs up.

 

It took 5 words plus this, instead of my name on the emoticon.

3 hours ago, herfiehandbag said:

That is what moderation is for.

 

On the other hand making the emojis anonymous could be construed as an attempt to modify the way that users express opinions, which is not particularly the job of moderators. If I like, agree with or wish to thank someone for making a point in a discussion then I think they should be able to know that. 

I gave you a thumbs up too.

Damned if we do damned if we dont !

 

CLOSED