Netanyahu rejects claims accusing Israel of genocide in Gaza

[Morch]

8 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Think?

Fist time for eveything

 

Guess we need that sarcasm alert emoji.

[Bkk Brian]

Just now, ozimoron said:

 

we can take that as a no.

I'll wait for Jeff's response

[ozimoron]

Just now, Bkk Brian said:

I'll wait for Jeff's response

 

I knew we weren't going to get an admission from you.

[Bkk Brian]

Just now, ozimoron said:

 

I knew we weren't going to get an admission from you.

From me? I've not read it, I've already told Jeff that so yet again proof you've not read this topic,

[Nick Carter icp]

14 hours ago, Jeff the Chef said:

Is the USA in front of the International Court of Justice, the highest court in the world?

 

  Seems to me like you were claiming that Israel must be guilty of something, solely because they have a Court case .

   Having a Court case doesn't mean anyone is guilty of anything , only a , errrmm . a Judge and Jury can pass judgment 

[Nick Carter icp]

18 minutes ago, Jeff the Chef said:

Did you, please show, or we can put it down as more "waffle" from Morch.

 

"Keep it in perspective , its a Court case .

Israel has been found guilty "

 

   Posted above

 

 

 

[Ben Zioner]

Why would Israel not be allowed to defend itself? Antisemitism? 

[Jeff the Chef]

28 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

Well have you read it, you asked me but have you?

Yes I have, I will admit to not getting a lot of it, so you just have to keep at it for a better understanding, try it.

[ozimoron]

26 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

From me? I've not read it, I've already told Jeff that so yet again proof you've not read this topic,

 

Odd that you are making public statements challenging the validity of the complaint but have not even read it. It says a lot.

[Morch]

1 minute ago, ozimoron said:

 

Odd that you are making public statements challenging the validity of the complaint but have not even read it. It says a lot.

 

@ozimoron

 

Coming from someone who constantly makes claims about these topics without reading them....

[Bkk Brian]

4 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

 

Odd that you are making public statements challenging the validity of the complaint but have not even read it. It says a lot.

Again you are just not reading this topic and miss the professionals including lawyers that I have referenced that have read it. Including:

 

John Kirby dismisses South Africa’s accusation against Israel: 

“We find this submission meritless, counterproductive, completely without any basis in fact whatsoever.”

 

 

[Bkk Brian]

9 minutes ago, Jeff the Chef said:

Yes I have, I will admit to not getting a lot of it, so you just have to keep at it for a better understanding, try it.

So you missed the 55 references to Hamas in the report? I've not read it in full but its a pdf, its fully searchable without having to read it in its entirety. You claimed its nothing to do with Hamas, try again.

[Jeff the Chef]

51 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   Yes, my point was that its only a Court case and Israel hasn't been found guilty of anything . 

You mentioned Israel being taken to Court ,like it was proof of something 

   

Gordon Bennett, for the last time, It is up to the Court to determine if Israel has anything to answer for from the Application Instituting Proceedings, at this moment in time there is no proof of anything only an Application before the Court.

We won't know anymore until the Court convenes on the 11th January 2024.

[Jeff the Chef]

3 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

So you missed the 55 references to Hamas in the report? I've not read it in full but its a pdf, its fully searchable without having to read it in its entirety. You claimed its nothing to do with Hamas, try again.

What I'm saying, ad infinitum is it is Israel that has been brought before the International Court of Justice, not Hamas.

I have no doubt that Israel will site Hamas as the cause of the War, that is their prerogative, but until the Court confines neither you or I or anybody else knows what will be said.

[Jeff the Chef]

17 minutes ago, Morch said:

 

@ozimoron

 

Coming from someone who constantly makes claims about these topics without reading them....

So you post more rubbish trying to muddy the waters, typical.

[Bkk Brian]

I've read what they have said

 

So what are the lawyers acting on behalf of Israel going to be concentrating on? You say you've read what they have to say?

 

If you think providing credible links is nothing more than being a parrot, then I suggest you are now starting the usual trolling responses

[Bkk Brian]

2 minutes ago, Jeff the Chef said:

What I'm saying, ad infinitum is it is Israel that has been brought before the International Court of Justice, not Hamas.

I have no doubt that Israel will site Hamas as the cause of the War, that is their prerogative, but until the Court confines neither you or I or anybody else knows what will be said.

No you said it has nothing to do with Hamas, you are very wrong, its everything to do with Hamas. That's why there is this sham case

[ozimoron]

3 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

No you said it has nothing to do with Hamas, you are very wrong, its everything to do with Hamas. That's why there is this sham case

 

Does the complaint only speak for Hamas?

[Nick Carter icp]

13 minutes ago, Jeff the Chef said:

Gordon Bennett, for the last time, It is up to the Court to determine if Israel has anything to answer for from the Application Instituting Proceedings, at this moment in time there is no proof of anything only an Application before the Court.

We won't know anymore until the Court convenes on the 11th January 2024.

 

  I know , I just told you that and you replied to me, telling me the same thing 

[Bkk Brian]

Just now, ozimoron said:

 

Does the complaint only speak for Hamas?

Read it and find out

[ozimoron]

1 minute ago, Bkk Brian said:

Read it and find out

 

I'm not the one alleging that it does.

 

"No you said it has nothing to do with Hamas, you are very wrong, its everything to do with Hamas. That's why there is this sham case"

Edited January 6 by ozimoron

[Jeff the Chef]

1 minute ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

  I know , I just told you that and you replied to me, telling me the same thing 

Whatever.

[Jeff the Chef]

6 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

No you said it has nothing to do with Hamas, you are very wrong, its everything to do with Hamas. That's why there is this sham case

Who is South Africa bringing proceedings against?

[ezzra]

Just wondering though, seeing a half a dozen or more members here who are very passionately adamant and resolute with their point of view on Israel and the Palestinians and the war in Gaza, has anyone been able to convince others, or has anyone 'saw the light'and changed their POV because of the relentless fiery posts here?...

Edited January 6 by ezzra

[Bkk Brian]

1 minute ago, ozimoron said:

 

I'm not the one alleging that it does.

 

"No you said it has nothing to do with Hamas, you are very wrong, its everything to do with Hamas. That's why there is this sham case"

 

20 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

So you missed the 55 references to Hamas in the report? I've not read it in full but its a pdf, its fully searchable without having to read it in its entirety. You claimed its nothing to do with Hamas, try again.

Read the topic @ozimoron ^^^^^

[Nick Carter icp]

8 minutes ago, Jeff the Chef said:

What I'm saying, ad infinitum is it is Israel that has been brought before the International Court of Justice, not Hamas.

I have no doubt that Israel will site Hamas as the cause of the War, that is their prerogative, but until the Court confines neither you or I or anybody else knows what will be said.

 

   Any Country can bring a Court case though, and it means nothing . 

You make it sound as it being taken to Court has some legal significance in regards to guilt

Any Country could bring charges against Hamas if they wanted to . 

[Bkk Brian]

Just now, Jeff the Chef said:

Who is South Africa bringing proceedings against?

do you think the judges will be ignoring the evidence of Hamas deliberately using civilians as human shields

[Nick Carter icp]

2 minutes ago, Jeff the Chef said:

Who is South Africa bringing proceedings against?

 

  Black South Africa doesn't like Israel , Israel were friendly with White South Africa,  pre Mandela

[Jeff the Chef]

9 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

No you said it has nothing to do with Hamas, you are very wrong, its everything to do with Hamas. That's why there is this sham case

So now it's a sham case according to you, I'm sure you will be called by the Israeli legal team to give your evidence of such.

[Yellowtail]

3 minutes ago, ezzra said:

Just wondering though, seeing a half a dozen or more members here who are very passionately adamant and resolute with their point of view on Israel and the Palestinians and the war in Gaza, has anyone been able to convince others, or has anyone 'saw the light'and changed their POV because of the relentless fiery posts here?...

I have changed my position a bit about the people supporting Palestine/Hamas. I used to just think they were fools.