Jump to content

POLITICS Trump says FBI raiding his Mar-a-Lago home


Recommended Posts

Posted
11 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

"Everyone was asked to leave the premises, they wanted to be left alone, without any witnesses to see what they were doing, taking or, hopefully not, ‘planting.’"

 

 

We are already talking about that quote .

That quote is currently being discussed at the moment .

There is no need to post that quote again

Posting a quote and keep changings the quotes  meaning, will not make the false claims to true  

Ok, then why did Trump say it (carefully worded in order to avoid being sued for defamation)?

Did he just say it randomly? Or was it to spread the idea that evidence may have been planted? 

Posted
2 minutes ago, candide said:

Ok, then why did Trump say it (carefully worded in order to avoid being sued for defamation)?

Did he just say it randomly? Or was it to spread the idea that evidence may have been planted? 

Who thinks we aren't now going to see a flood of right wing claims that the  FBI planted evidence on Trump?

  • Like 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

Yep, as the article said the planting of a nice new conspiracy theory that's already taken off by his ardent fan base

It hasnt though .

From what I've seen , anyone who questions what may have been in the safe , they are the ones who are in denial  are part of the conspiracy .

  • Confused 1
Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

It hasnt though .

From what I've seen , anyone who questions what may have been in the safe , they are the ones who are in denial  are part of the conspiracy .

If anyone claims that the FBI planted evidence is that not a conspiracy theory?

Edited by ozimoron
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

Who thinks we aren't now going to see a flood of right wing claims that the  FBI planted evidence on Trump?

Wait, wait , wait  you need to wait until some evidence has been produced about any files found in Trumos safe , then you need to wait for some people to claim it was planted .

   You are jumping the gun .

Wait until anyone claims it was planted, before you make the suggestion 

Posted
Just now, Mac Mickmanus said:

It hasnt though .

From what I've seen , anyone who questions what may have been in the safe , they are the ones who are in denial  are part of the conspiracy .

What do you mean it hasn't? 

 

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene

I think there is an extremely high probability that the FBI planted “evidence” against President Trump. Otherwise WHY would they NOT allow his attorneys or anyone watch them while they conducted their unprecedented raid? They know the consequences of an empty handed power move.

https://twitter.com/RepMTG/status/1557353978425495554

 

  • Thanks 2
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

Wait, wait , wait  you need to wait until some evidence has been produced about any files found in Trumos safe , then you need to wait for some people to claim it was planted .

   You are jumping the gun .

Wait until anyone claims it was planted, before you make the suggestion 

They already did. From the above yahoo link

 

Fox News' Jesse Watters said on Tuesday that the FBI "probably" planted evidence when it raided Mar-a-Lago, a claim for which there is no evidence, and which he made little effort to back up.

 

It would take an indictment followed by a conviction to convince me and any reasonable person that the FBI planted evidence. Wouldn't you agree with that?

 

In the meantime is it not tenuous and irresponsible to even imply that it may have happened? Or to amplify the claim on any media?

Edited by ozimoron
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

What do you mean it hasn't? 

 

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene

I think there is an extremely high probability that the FBI planted “evidence” against President Trump. Otherwise WHY would they NOT allow his attorneys or anyone watch them while they conducted their unprecedented raid? They know the consequences of an empty handed power move.

https://twitter.com/RepMTG/status/1557353978425495554

 

 

5 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

They already did. From the above yahoo link

 

Fox News' Jesse Watters said on Tuesday that the FBI "probably" planted evidence when it raided Mar-a-Lago, a claim for which there is no evidence, and which he made little effort to back up.

 

It would take an indictment followed by a conviction to convince me and any reasonable person that the FBI planted evidence. Wouldn't you agree with that?

 

In the meantime is it not tenuous and irresponsible to even imply that it may have happened? Or to amplify the claim on any media?

That is a persons twitter account .

Why not reply to her on Twitter ?

I am not going to reply to her Twitter post here on ASEANNOW

Why not reply to her on Twitter ?

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

 

That is a persons twitter account .

Why not reply to her on Twitter ?

I am not going to reply to her Twitter post here on ASEANNOW

Why not reply to her on Twitter ?

This is Rep Marjorie Taylor Greene official twitter account and why would I need to reply to her? Trump made his statement on Truth Social would you like to reply to him?

Posted
24 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

If anyone claims that the FBI planted evidence is that not a conspiracy theory?

Well, putting  aside the "conspiracy theory " suggestions .

If a person made the claim that the authorities planted some things on them , it would either be true or untrue .

   But, hypothetically; If a Policeman planted some drugs on you and arrested you for possession , would it be a conspiracy to say the Police planted drugs on you ?

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
19 minutes ago, candide said:

The right analogy would be that there's no reason to believe a known drug dealer when he claims that the police has planted drug on him.

Check reddit bad cop no donut.

 

Many tales of police and government officials abusing their power.

  • Like 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, heybruce said:

That suggests that Trump is really worried about what the FBI found.

If you read the article, you will see that Trump hasn't stated that anything had been planted . 

  • Haha 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

That isnt true .

Trump has not claimed that evidence was planted 

You are either mistaken  or you are making things up 

You may not be up to date on all of 45's recent postings to Truth...

 

"Trump said on his Twitter knockoff Truth Social. "Everyone was asked to leave the premises, they wanted to be left alone, without any witnesses to see what they were doing, taking or, hopefully not, 'planting.'"

  • Thanks 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, mikebike said:

You may not be up to date on all of 45's recent postings to Truth...

 

"Trump said on his Twitter knockoff Truth Social. "Everyone was asked to leave the premises, they wanted to be left alone, without any witnesses to see what they were doing, taking or, hopefully not, 'planting.'"

Yes, where in that paragraph does Trump make the allegation that the FBI planted something ?

   

  • Haha 2
Posted
12 minutes ago, heybruce said:

That suggests that Trump is really worried about what the FBI found.

He know what the FBI found as he was given the inventory list. It must be incriminating and worrisome that he is culpable to serious criminal jeopardy and must be kept away from the ears and eyes of his gullible base. His pathetic defence is to spread misinformation and sowing confusion. Typical Trump and also his sycophant loyalist lawmakers and FOX. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

Wait, wait , wait  you need to wait until some evidence has been produced about any files found in Trumos safe , then you need to wait for some people to claim it was planted .

   You are jumping the gun .

Wait until anyone claims it was planted, before you make the suggestion 

Huh?

 

Trump accuses FBI of ‘planting’ evidence in Mar-a-Lago raid with sly statement

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
Just now, Eric Loh said:

He know what the FBI found as he was given the inventory list. It must be incriminating and worrisome that he is culpable to serious criminal jeopardy and must be kept away from the ears and eyes of his gullible base. His pathetic defence is to spread misinformation and sowing confusion. Typical Trump and also his sycophant loyalist lawmakers and FOX. 

Speaking of spreading misinformation , Trump hasnt said that anything was planted . 

  • Haha 1
Posted
3 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

"

In an interview with DailyMail.com, Eric Trump said that because staff refused to turn off the surveillance cameras at the request of the FBI, the Mar-a-Lago cameras captured agents raiding areas that they weren't authorized to.

"There's 30 agents there," he recalled on Wednesday. "They told our lawyer...'You have to leave the property right now. Turn off all security cameras.'"

https://www.newsweek.com/eric-trump-says-mar-lago-security-cameras-captured-fbi-acting-improperly-during-raid-1732672

 

So contrary to the FBI's belief all cameras were turned off, they weren't. So any untoward things the FBI did at Mar a Lago will all be on film. Anything planted will be have been caught. Sounds like another case where the investigation is a far bigger scandal and crime than what was being investigated. No flies on Eric Trump!

Maybe they'll have to do another raid to get the VDO data drives? And another after that if they leave an FBI cap behind! Trump likes hats. Add M G A and change it to M F B I G A maybe?

 

  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

You link doesn't back up the claim . 

You link says Trump said :  "Everyone was asked to leave the premises, they wanted to be left alone, without any witnesses to see what they were doing, taking or, hopefully not, 'planting.'

 

 

Trump isn't making  claiming  that the FBI planted something , he is saying...................well, read what he said ^ . 

Yeah you are 100% right! Its just like Tucker asking "questions"... why would anyone have the impression that he is making a statement to his ravenous base?

  • Thanks 1
Posted
33 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

What about if the Policemen had a history  of planting drugs on people and making false  accusations ?

Who has planted anything on Trump before?

Posted
19 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

If you read the article, you will see that Trump hasn't stated that anything had been planted . 

Last time I promise, he implied it and there's no substantive difference in the minds of those who would amplify that accusation.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Phoenix Rising said:

OK, now that exact statement has been posted about three or four times already this morning and I have already answered that numerous times .

   It gets repetitive  in keep writing the same reply over and over again . Could you scroll back and read the previous posts where that quote is being discussed ? 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...