2 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

IMO a million % correct. Anyone looking a Hillary and knowing her past would have had doubts about her, and IMO enough did to elect Trump.

 

I've always said that if it had been Bernie, he'd have won by a landslide.

You think Hillary has a questionable background?  More so than Trump?  ????

 

Bernie would have lost in a landslide.  That's why Trump tried to blackmail Zelenski into inventing evidence against Biden before the 2020 election, he didn't want to face him.

2 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Hmmmmm. Isn't bringing 3 past wars into it the definition of whataboutery?

 

Fact- he didn't start any wars on HIS watch. Always a good thing for those that would have died.

Other than tax cuts for the rich and embarrassing the country, Trump didn't accomplish much of anything on HIS watch.

54 minutes ago, placeholder said:

Please share with us your evidence that Biden has his hand in the cookie jar? Are you claiming that he committed tax fraud? His statements are a matter of public record. Or, as per usual, are you just making things up?

When the truth has been revealed you might want to wipe the egg from your face.

Just now, vandeventer said:

When the truth has been revealed you might want to wipe the egg from your face.

There is nothing so lame as offering as a rebuttal events which haven't yet occurred. Anyway, are you still  wiping the egg off of your face because of the outcome of the 2020 election?

Anyway, I promise you that in the unlikely event that your prediction comes true, I won't be claiming fraud or malfeasance to explain away my error. Can you say the same?

20 minutes ago, vandeventer said:

When the truth has been revealed you might want to wipe the egg from your face.

Sounds awfully similar to the evidence on the voter fraud. Is that you Rudy?

35 minutes ago, placeholder said:

There is nothing so lame as offering as a rebuttal events which haven't yet occurred. Anyway, are you still  wiping the egg off of your face because of the outcome of the 2020 election?

Anyway, I promise you that in the unlikely event that your prediction comes true, I won't be claiming fraud or malfeasance to explain away my error. Can you say the same?

First, I hope Hillary doesn't keep you up at night. Second yes, what ever the factual truth is revealed about Biden and his family.

7 minutes ago, vandeventer said:

First, I hope Hillary doesn't keep you up at night. Second yes, what ever the factual truth is revealed about Biden and his family.

So, what exactly do you mean by "factual truth"? In order to calibrate what you mean by "factual truth, here's a question for you: Is it a factual truth that Biden's victory of Trump was legimitate and the claims of major vote fraud that would have affected the outcome are false? I'm only asking this question to see what your standards are and if they are worth anything.

11 minutes ago, placeholder said:

So, what exactly do you mean by "factual truth"? In order to calibrate what you mean by "factual truth, here's a question for you: Is it a factual truth that Biden's victory of Trump was legimitate and the claims of major vote fraud that would have affected the outcome are false? I'm only asking this question to see what your standards are and if they are worth anything.

Let's hope you keep supporting Biden in 2024, you maybe the only one in your party that does.

2 minutes ago, vandeventer said:

Let's hope you keep supporting Biden in 2024, you maybe the only one in your party that does.

Utterly irrelevant comment.

It's clear you're attempting to distract from the fact that "factual truth" means whatever you want it to mean.

You've got nothing.

38 minutes ago, vandeventer said:

Let's hope you keep supporting Biden in 2024, you maybe the only one in your party that does.

Come on! Please, tell us: according to you, is it a factual truth that Biden's victory of Trump was legimitate and the claims of major vote fraud that would have affected the outcome are false? 

3 hours ago, vandeventer said:

Delay, delay, delay, it looks like DA Braggs might lose his job either way it may go? So in the end it may be just dropped leaving a confused look on every Democrats face. Who knows they might start looking at Biden and family who's hands are always in the cookie jar.

I like the way that you make so many allegations against President Biden and his family, but NEVER follow it up up with verifiable proof, links etc.

 

If you have the proof of your allegations, then please publish them and send the proof to the US courts. If you cannot prove anything then your post is full of lies and worthless as usual.

 

If YOU allege it, then YOU must be able to prove it, Otherwise withdraw it.

 

 

2 hours ago, vandeventer said:

When the truth has been revealed you might want to wipe the egg from your face.

Well reveal it to us all now, if of course you actually have the "truth".

4 hours ago, vandeventer said:

First, I hope Hillary doesn't keep you up at night. Second yes, what ever the factual truth is revealed about Biden and his family.

Factual truth? You, like trump, wouldn't recognize a factual truth even if André The Giant smacked you over the head with it.

1 hour ago, Phoenix Rising said:

Factual truth? You, like trump, wouldn't recognize a factual truth even if André The Giant smacked you over the head with it.

You watch way too much CNN? Andre the giant? you must be older than me?

5 hours ago, billd766 said:

Well reveal it to us all now, if of course you actually have the "truth".

The truth is that the USA seems to be going off the rails that so many Americans actually believe this garbage.

But it is catchy.

 

Related to this topic because  if

 

Trump won (he didn’t)

He would still.be president [he isn't)

Which means he couldn't be indicted  (he can be)

 

 

  

 

11 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

The truth is that the USA seems to be going off the rails that so many Americans actually believe this garbage.

But it is catchy.

 

Related to this topic because  if

 

Trump won (he didn’t)

He would still.be president [he isn't)

Which means he couldn't be indicted  (he can be)

 

 

  

 

Catchy tune, nice lyrics, but total BS.

9 hours ago, heybruce said:

Other than tax cuts for the rich and embarrassing the country, Trump didn't accomplish much of anything on HIS watch.

Oh mr Bruce you forgot so much he deserves credit for blowing up the deficit 25% in 4 short years setting women’s rights back 50 years damaging our educational system killing Americans in the thousands by mishandling Covid giving wind to various conspiracy theories empowering hate groups stirring up civil unrest oh lord he was quite prolific in all the wrong ways but perhaps his greatest failure was his attempt to kill nato for his hero.this man deserves to be imprisoned for so much more than cheating on his wife and paying off some broad then trying to hide the deed

22 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

 

remember when people were saying that Trump wouldn't voluntarily  leave the Whitehouse and they would have to forcibly remove him 

Why would people say that without a good reason!

 

‘I’m just not going to leave’: New book reveals Trump vowed to stay in White House

 

Trump threatened not to leave White House after election loss, book says | US politics | The Guardian

 

 

8 minutes ago, LosLobo said:

Why would people say that without a good reason!

 

‘I’m just not going to leave’: New book reveals Trump vowed to stay in White House

 

Trump threatened not to leave White House after election loss, book says | US politics | The Guardian

 

 

Another overheard quote heard by an anonymous person published in a book for sale  ????

Actually, for what my opinion is worth, I think it's a pretty weak case, too. It's not the kind of case that would ordinarily get prosecuted. The strongest case against Trump, by far, is the one based on unauthorized documents at Mar a Lago including an obstruction of justice charge or charges that look pretty indisputable.

Numerous off-topic, troll posts with memes, have been removed.  Continue to post off-topic, fake memes will earn suspensions.  It is a discussion forum.  

19 hours ago, placeholder said:

Utterly irrelevant comment.

It's clear you're attempting to distract from the fact that "factual truth" means whatever you want it to mean.

You've got nothing.

Come-on man!!!

5 minutes ago, vandeventer said:

Come-on man!!!

More of the same. You've got nothing.

1 hour ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Does this mean it was YET ANOTHER case of desperate overreach by the left that has failed once again? What was the old saying about making sure not to miss when you try and kill the monarch? Just incredible how many false accusations they made against Trump, and still the left believe every balmy claim. IMO Soros and his woke DA Bragg should be facing charges for politically/hate motivated persecution of a popular politician that gave America- and indeed the world an incredibly peaceful and prosperous few years.

 

Yowzers!!!

 

"In it, Cohen told the Federal Election Commission that he “used his own personal funds to facilitate a payment of $130,000 to Ms. Stephanie Clifford,” aka Daniels, in 2016.

“Neither the Trump Organization nor the Trump campaign was a party to the transaction with Ms. Clifford, and neither reimbursed Mr. Cohen for the payment directly or indirectly,” Cohen lawyer Stephen Ryan wrote on Feb. 8, 2018."

https://nypost.com/2023/03/22/2018-letter-shows-michael-cohen-lying-to-federal-officials/

 

This feels like the day the Mueller witch hunt ended in tears.....

Yes. It certainly appears that this case has failed. Shock horror! Who knew?

 

Don't forget to watch Desperate Overreach (Series 45) again next week.

8 minutes ago, nauseus said:

Yes. It certainly appears that this case has failed. Shock horror! Who knew?

 

Don't forget to watch Desperate Overreach (Series 45) again next week.

There is absolutely no indication the case has failed.

 

But you bring to mind my comment last year on how Trump supporters would be in denial as the cases against him proceed.

 

 

I very much doubt that AG Bragg is worried about a sleazy Ohio gym coach.

Kind of weird the way people keep stealing Jordan's jackets, what's up with that?

 

 

Tenth Amendment anybody?

 

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/mar/23/alvin-bragg-house-republicans-trump-letter

Right or wrong all the Dems. want to do is get Trump. You have nothing give up your witch hunt.

https://fb.watch/jsUiphzfqG/

17 minutes ago, vandeventer said:

Right or wrong all the Dems. want to do is get Trump. You have nothing give up your witch hunt.

https://fb.watch/jsUiphzfqG/

Seriously no one want to get Trump least Dems who will be happy if he run. He is so beatable. Trump did all these crimes by himself. He is not that smart; that you should know. 

15 minutes ago, vandeventer said:

Right or wrong all the Dems. want to do is get Trump. You have nothing give up your witch hunt.

https://fb.watch/jsUiphzfqG/

We'll see what happens next week. The very muted response to his calls for violent civil war to protect his lard derriere is a sign that the useful idiots are losing their usefulness.