Jump to content

Why so many chinese cars MG cars ? do people only care to buy something cheap, whatever is the quality ?


Recommended Posts

Posted
On 10/18/2021 at 6:45 PM, London Lowf said:

In the sixties some people laughed at Japanese motorbikes, and then in the seventies Japanese cars.

 

China is taking over as the manufacturing hub of the world and there is nothing to stop it as, at the end of the day, people want cheap stuff - and it's not necessarily poor quality.

China's industrial base will collapse entirely within this decade.  The country suffers from a critical inverted population pyramid.  Were is the labor going to come from to run this manufacturing hub.

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Adumbration said:

China's industrial base will collapse entirely within this decade.  The country suffers from a critical inverted population pyramid.  Were is the labor going to come from to run this manufacturing hub.

In ten years time it seems that there will be very little need for human labour - or brainpower nfor that matter.

 

I'll be popping off around then so I don't really care.

Edited by London Lowf
  • Like 1
Posted
11 hours ago, Adumbration said:

China's industrial base will collapse entirely within this decade.  The country suffers from a critical inverted population pyramid.  Were is the labor going to come from to run this manufacturing hub.

Remember that not all of the models owned by SAIC, BYD, GWM are being built in China.  The MG's are being built here in Thailand, and new factories for BYD are going in or are already building cars here.

Posted
1 minute ago, ThailandRyan said:

Remember that not all of the models owned by SAIC, BYD, GWM are being built in China.  The MG's are being built here in Thailand, and new factories for BYD are going in or are already building cars here.

Thailand also has an inverted population pyramid.  It is not as critical as China (because of the one child policy) but it is still a serious problem for the future of Thailand.  Did you miss all the recent articles posted here about Thailand's ageing population.

 

Smart business are relocating out of Thailand and China and moving to Vietnam and Myanmar.  Not for political reasons but for long term access to labor.  Have a look at the population pyramid for Myanmar:

 

https://www.populationpyramid.net/myanmar/2019/

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Adumbration said:

Thailand also has an inverted population pyramid.  It is not as critical as China (because of the one child policy) but it is still a serious problem for the future of Thailand.  Did you miss all the recent articles posted here about Thailand's ageing population.

 

Smart business are relocating out of Thailand and China and moving to Vietnam and Myanmar.  Not for political reasons but for long term access to labor.  Have a look at the population pyramid for Myanmar:

 

https://www.populationpyramid.net/myanmar/2019/

 

You might want to do some more research as far as the manufacturing goes, and it has nothing to do with Thailands ageing population.

 

https://www.businessinsider.com/chinese-supply-chains-moving-companies-outside-mainland-2023-4?op=1

 

As Southeast Asia's second-largest economy, Thailand has been moving up the value chain in manufacturing and is a production hub for car parts, vehicles, and electronics, with multinationals such as Sony and Sharp setting up shop there.

And Chinese companies aren't too far behind either.

For instance, Chinese companies have relocated parts of their supply chains to Thailand. Companies producing solar panels, such as Shanghai's JinkoSolar, are moving their production to the island nation to take advantage of lower costs and avoid geopolitical tensions, the South China Morning Post reported in July.

Chinese car-parts manufacturers are also making their way to Thailand due to pressure from their overseas clients who are now wary of relying too much on China and over geopolitical tensions, Bloomberg reported on April 11, citing car-parts suppliers.

Posted
2 minutes ago, ThailandRyan said:

You might want to do some more research as far as the manufacturing goes, and it has nothing to do with Thailands ageing population.

 

https://www.businessinsider.com/chinese-supply-chains-moving-companies-outside-mainland-2023-4?op=1

 

As Southeast Asia's second-largest economy, Thailand has been moving up the value chain in manufacturing and is a production hub for car parts, vehicles, and electronics, with multinationals such as Sony and Sharp setting up shop there.

And Chinese companies aren't too far behind either.

For instance, Chinese companies have relocated parts of their supply chains to Thailand. Companies producing solar panels, such as Shanghai's JinkoSolar, are moving their production to the island nation to take advantage of lower costs and avoid geopolitical tensions, the South China Morning Post reported in July.

Chinese car-parts manufacturers are also making their way to Thailand due to pressure from their overseas clients who are now wary of relying too much on China and over geopolitical tensions, Bloomberg reported on April 11, citing car-parts suppliers.

I dont need to research.  It is a mathematical certainty Thailand will not have enough labor in the next decade.  Pinch is already being felt in Hospitality industry here did you miss those articles as well?  And how will China import and export car parts, and cars, when the conflict in the South China Sea kicks off?

Posted
7 minutes ago, Adumbration said:

I dont need to research.  It is a mathematical certainty Thailand will not have enough labor in the next decade.  Pinch is already being felt in Hospitality industry here did you miss those articles as well?  And how will China import and export car parts, and cars, when the conflict in the South China Sea kicks off?

When and if a conflict kicks off the world supply of everything will be affected, much like it was during Covid when cars could not be assembled to completion due to Chip issues.  Current volitivity in the Ukraine has also reduced exports of food stuffs.  If we have another major conflict the whole world will be affected when it comes to parts for cars no matter where they will be coming from.  Local factories will need to be built in order to build all in house, and one day things will look like they did 40 years ago. Nothing is a mathematical certainty, unless things stay status quo and outside forces do not come into play.

 

My MG HS-X is now 3 years old, runs like a top, and has only had one issue and that was caused by a defective battery which was replaced under warranty.  I have now over 30k KM's on it.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, ThailandRyan said:

Remember that not all of the models owned by SAIC, BYD, GWM are being built in China.  The MG's are being built here in Thailand, and new factories for BYD are going in or are already building cars here.

Cheap labour and tax and other givernment incentives (v.BOI) decide where cars are built.

But modern car plants are almost empty of people. It depends on the product.

In Thailand cars are built to varying degrees according to Thai regulations. TKD requires only imported parts but there are import duties.

To avoid the taxes a certain amount of the car must be manufactured from scratch in the country 

 

Posted (edited)
16 hours ago, kwilco said:

You clearly haven't visited a motor factory in the last 20 years or so

The MG, a British car, well it says so on the boot, ????, but in reality one is buying a ride made with Chinese materials, probably the reason they can undercut others in the price range.

In my longish life, I have bought many Chinese made items that have failed or fallen apart, including my wheelbarrow, no undercoat and cr_p metal, rusted away in short order.......????

 

So why would I think their cars are any different. I mean, they bought a retired British brand name, which they use as a smoke screen.

 

 

 

 

Edited by Pink Mist
Troll portion of post removed
  • Confused 2
  • Sad 2
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, transam said:

British car, well it says so on the boot

It says "MG" - stands for Morris Garages, but nowhere does it claim to be British.

Since Brexit, dozens of British brands have either moved or been sold abroad or are foreign owned.

Edited by kwilco
Posted
1 minute ago, kwilco said:

It says "MG" - stands for Morris Garages, but nowhere does it claim to be British.

Since Brexit, dozens of British brands have either moved or been sold abroad.

You see, you know nothing about the Chinese MG...

 

MG is the racing logo of Morris Garages, their basic cars are called  ...MORRIS..........

On the rear of the Chinese rides there is a badge, even the Chinese Maxus truck has an MG variant, 100% Chinese except the MG bling..

 

The Chinese MG quotes in their MG advertising, since 1924.....????

 

Here is the boot badge.....????

 

MG Morris Garages Brit Dynamic Thailand Trunk Emblem | Lazada PH

 

Here is

Posted
1 hour ago, transam said:

You see, you know nothing about the Chinese MG...

 

MG is the racing logo of Morris Garages, their basic cars are called  ...MORRIS..........

On the rear of the Chinese rides there is a badge, even the Chinese Maxus truck has an MG variant, 100% Chinese except the MG bling..

 

The Chinese MG quotes in their MG advertising, since 1924.....????

 

Here is the boot badge.....????

 

MG Morris Garages Brit Dynamic Thailand Trunk Emblem | Lazada PH

 

Here is

 

Speaking as somebody born in Abingdon I find this profoundly dishonest.

 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
43 minutes ago, Gweiloman said:

Any basis for saying this? Or just ingrained bias?

Yeah don't understand peoples comments like that about Chinese car manufacturers they use to say the same about Japanese cars. 

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

My neighbor bought a MG HS. He first looked at the ZS but it didn't have a turbo and was a little too basic. Wanting a little more he test drove the HS and he was really impressed, a much smoother and powerful ride with turbo and dual clutch. They gave him quite a discount, he ended up talking them down from 1.1 million to around 980 thousand.

 

I was very dubious that the HS was going to be any good but once I got inside I was pretty shocked how nice the interior is. Then we took a couple of trips up to the recent Bangkok auto shows, once again, very surprised. I've been a big fan of Japanese cars for over 40 years I thought I would find many faults with his MG. But I have to be honest, so far I haven't found any. 

 

He's had the HS for around a year and a half, taken many long trips and had zero problems. Man, he loves his cars too, takes excellent care both in cleanliness and maintenance.

 

He does admit he doesn't know how the reliability will hold up, that's the one thing that hasn't been answered. But so far I can only say his HS is much, much better than I expected. 

Edited by Furioso
  • Love It 2
Posted
16 hours ago, HauptmannUK said:

Apart from in battery technology (CATL Lithium Ion) the Chinese do not yet have the domestic expertise and IPR to produce cars which would be competitive on the international market.  EVERY Chinese-branded vehicle sold outside China is predominantly using European, American and Japanese technology. SAIC (who inherited rights to the MG brand name when they bought Nanjing Auto) is in effect 'GM China'.  SAIC petrol engines are GM engines, the SGE and MGE engines, developed around 15 years ago by GM-Opel in Germany. These same engines are built in Flint, Michigan, and Korea, using the same equipment as in China (from Hirata, Japan). They're the same engines used in small GM cars such as the Cruze and the now-defunct GM Europe products such as the Opel Corsa/Astra/Insignia etc. They suffer the same problems (weak timing chains and coil pack failures).  If a turbo it fitted then its a Mitsubishi. The MG transmissions are a GM manual box, a DCT auto (supplied in kit form by BorgWarner in Dalian and assembled by SAICs 'Gearworks' - 'SAGW'). These are BW DualTronic three-shaft wet clutch 'boxes, designed in Germany. Fundamentally these are the same core units as supplied to VW/Audi Group ('DSG' branded) but with a simpler and cheaper mechatronic control unit. The CVTs are Bosch, made under licence by SAGW. Apparently the Bosch units have been problematic so currently Aisin (Toyota) CVT units are being used.

MG platforms are GM platforms. Specifically the GEM ('Global Emerging Market') and the so-called 'PATAC-K' platform which is a cost-reduced Chevrolet D2 chassis with and also used in cars like the Buick Excelle, Chevrolet Cavalier - amongst numerous others.

MG BEV's use GM BEV platforms with power electronics designed by DriveTec of Switzerland (now owned by BW).

If you want to go out and buy a Haval (GWM) - well, their petrol engines (with code 4G) are Mitsubishi units built under licence. Engines with code GW are based on fairly ancient Toyota blocks with new heads developed by GWM/Toyota to meet modern emissions requirements.  The blocks are R4 and R5 last used by Toyota in the 1980s.  The Haval Diesel is an Isuzu unit built under licence.  In fact most Diesel engines made in China are some version or other of an Isuzu unit.  Havel electric drives are designed and supplied by BorgWarner.  DCT transmissions are basically the same BW units supplied to SAIC.  Havel TC-epicyclic autoboxes are ZF (Friedrichshafen, Germany) 8HP units built in China.

Anyway, to all of you driving 'MG's, you're actually driving a 'GM'.

MG, Haval, Maxus etc are all 'challenger brands' designed to capture market share through pricing. 

You can probably guess that I've 'been there and got the T-shirt' on this stuff. In fact you might be able to guess which supplier I did some work for....

Good stuff,  it brings to mind in my 1960 onwards car time that 5 of the most reliable cars I had were GM. 

Posted (edited)
On 10/19/2021 at 3:34 AM, kwilco said:

some of the highest quality products in ANY field..... c

Their aircraft are terrible.  To date, they have not be able to design and build a jet capable of operating off a carrier.  Their civil aircraft are poor, uneconomic  knock off designs that don't meet western spec. 

Edited by Doctor Tom
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Doctor Tom said:

Their aircraft are terrible.  To date, they have not be able to design and build a jet capable of operating off a carrier.  Their civil aircraft are poor, uneconomic  knock off designs that don't meet western spec. 

And strangely here, their cars are the nuts....................:whistling:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...