Jump to content

Will this pandemic ever end as the infections in the UK surge again.


Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 The list of people who might have been under more scrutiny than Fauci must be quite short.

Not so short . Many are his own countryman 

 

Posted
7 minutes ago, Jeffr2 said:

If you doubt Fauci, then you're reading the wrong news.  Where do you get your information?

Lets put it this way , i try to steer clear of the Murdock influence 

  • Haha 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

Not easy in this day age...sadly.

Yes, i agree , but i still read some of his material . You need to read more than one point of view and that has become so much easier with the internet .

  • Haha 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, itsari said:

Yes, i agree , but i still read some of his material . You need to read more than one point of view and that has become so much easier with the internet .

Most of the info on the internet is misinformation.  Be careful what you read.

  • Like 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Jeffr2 said:

The origin of covid is unknown.  But to bash Fauci for any other reason is BS. We're learning more and more about this virus every day. 

 

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jackbrewster/2021/06/16/heres-what-dr-fauci-has-said-about-covids-origins-and-the-lab-leak-theory/?sh=3915bd8fa853

 

Fauci tells CNN he still believes “the most likely origin is from an animal species to a human but I keep an absolutely open mind that there may be other origins,” adding, “It could have been a lab leak.”

Fauci also denies any US government funding of the French built laboratory in Wuhan . Others say something different .

Again , i have no idea what the truth is . I just read . 

 

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, GroveHillWanderer said:

He has said that he thinks it is probably of animal origin but that it may have come via a lab leak and he is keeping an open mind on the matter.

 

What is there to disagree with in that?

That is his professional opinion , other professionals do not  agree with him . 

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
48 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

Fair enough.....but don't forget the "vaccine paradox".

 

If the vast majority of a population are vaccinated and the minority unvaccinated (some of whom could still be immunized through natural infection), then the number of vaccinated people becoming infected, hospitalized or dying could/should(?) exceed those of the unvaccinated population.

This is true and it is the point the media make most often these days. However the narrative has changed a few times. A few months ago the narrative was "nearly all hospitalised people are non vaccinated". Now the narrative is something like  "ok, a lot of vaccinated patients in hospitals, but mostly very old patients", or alternatively (in countries where the vaccination rate is very high): "no wonder most patients in hospital are vaccinated, since most people in the country are".

 

In the end, what matters is how many people get severely ill in spite of being vaccinated (forget the unvaccinated, let's say they deserve it). But if you get full hospitals in spite of a successful vaccination campaign, that's bad whichever way you interpret the stats.

  • Like 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, GroveHillWanderer said:

He has said that he thinks it is probably of animal origin but that it may have come via a lab leak and he is keeping an open mind on the matter.

 

What is there to disagree with in that?

The disagreements lie in the broad answer and the question of the funding given to the laboratory built by the French in Wuhan China .

  • Like 1
  • Confused 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, itsari said:

That is his professional opinion , other professionals do not  agree with him . 

He has literally covered all the bases, and has not committed to a specific theory of how it arose. Anyone who says that know for certain how it came about, is lying.

  • Like 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, itsari said:

The disagreements lie in the broad answer and the question of the funding given to the laboratory built by the French in Wuhan China .

As I just pointed out (and provided evidence for) Fauci has clearly stated that the US provided funding to the Wuhan lab.

  • Like 2
Posted
Just now, GroveHillWanderer said:

As I just pointed out (and provided evidence for) Fauci has clearly stated that the US provided funding to the Wuhan lab.

Yes, but what was the funding involved with ?

Fauci denies any research to do with covid . 

Many say something different .

Close to two years has passed and no real conclusion on the start of this virus . 

  • Sad 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Jeffr2 said:

Stunning you are so open to allowing more to die.  But make sense based on your posts over the past year or so.  A covid denier for sure.

Apologies, I thought it was me you were replying too, so edited reply.

  • Like 2
Posted
2 hours ago, 4MyEgo said:

I ask this because it sure doesn't look like it's going to work looking at the UK for example, in my opinion

The UK government has abandoned any pretense of even trying to restrict the spread of the coronavirus. It would be amazing if cases were not rising.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
Quote

Will this pandemic ever end as the infections in the UK surge again.

No, and it could get worse in the near future. Like Bill Gates said: Wait until the next pandemic.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
53 minutes ago, Jeffr2 said:

The origin of covid is unknown.  But to bash Fauci for any other reason is BS. We're learning more and more about this virus every day. 

 

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jackbrewster/2021/06/16/heres-what-dr-fauci-has-said-about-covids-origins-and-the-lab-leak-theory/?sh=3915bd8fa853

 

Fauci tells CNN he still believes “the most likely origin is from an animal species to a human but I keep an absolutely open mind that there may be other origins,” adding, “It could have been a lab leak.”

I believe Fauci has lost a lot of credibility of late with the NIH confirming that grants were given for Game of Function research whereas Fauci said he didn't provide funds for Game of Function, not to mention what transpired in 2017 after Obama put a stop on it in 2014, don't need to explain myself on that I believe ?

 

https://news.yahoo.com/nih-admits-funding-gain-function-125103852.html

 

https://www.nih.gov/about-nih/who-we-are/nih-director/statements/nih-lifts-funding-pause-gain-function-research

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, itsari said:

I never post second hand information .

Look for your self .

 

Ridiculous.  Afraid to show where you get your info. I can guess.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, itsari said:

The disagreements lie in the broad answer and the question of the funding given to the laboratory built by the French in Wuhan China .

Post a link proving this.  Otherwise, BS.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...