Jump to content

Pattaya retirees feel “trapped” in Thailand because of insurance


Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, Jeffr2 said:

It will be checkmate for me, absolutely.  I'm on the verge of leaving anyway.  Not sure where yet! LOL

Are all of the Asian countries having a similar entry requirement , similar to the Thai Pass ? To be more specific I was thinking about Cambodia . 

Posted
3 hours ago, steven100 said:

they have alot of ruby's and other precious stones there.

They sure have, but the health system is not so good and especially not in the small towns and settlements.

The winter is long and the summer is short.

Only citizens from Nordic countries can live in Greenland without permission, all other citizens shall have permission and many shall have special visa which is not easy to get.

Accomodation are not easy to get and can be very expensive.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
22 hours ago, jacko45k said:

People can live in Thailand on a retirement or marriage extension without any medical insurance..... but if they take a trip home, they will need insurance to get back in. Many feel they are too old or unhealthy or unable to afford  insurance, hence cannot leave.. as they would not qualify to return.

Yes this is a big problem for over 74 yrs old. Many insurance companies will not offer insurance over this age. Those that do dramatically increase their price as the period of cover (return to Thailand date and period to visa extension renewal date). Examples, over 74, and 180 days cover, Baht 23,040, over 180 days Baht 43,200. Note that the Thai Pass requirement says "Health Insurance with covid cover" If the concern is about returning retirees coming down with Covid, then make the insurance covid specific. This should dramatically reduce the cost. The fact is double vaxed people including over 74's are a very small percentage of those requiring hospitalization from covid. Un-vaxed people are those most likely to require hospitalization. Note also that the Thai Pass requires you to be double vaxed. Why should returning over 74's who dont need health insurance for their visa extension renewal, but suddenly do on their return from a home country family visit.   

  • Like 2
Posted
20 hours ago, redwood1 said:

Well the last I heard and I could be wrong was all the other visas only needed  50,000 dollars covid insurance and the O and OA needed 100,000 dollars insurance covid and health........But like I said I could be wrong..

The difference is whether you are talking about obtaining a new O or O-A visa, or entering on a re-entry permit.

 

Everyone needs at least 50K health insurance that includes COVID to enter the country.

Posted
18 hours ago, sandyf said:

I returned on the 8th of October on a re-entry permit. I was stamped in until the 10th August 22 and my insurance is valid until 16th Dec 21. I used the airline insurance.

Presumably you had a return ticket that left in 16 December?

Posted
22 hours ago, Chris.B said:

Since when does a Non-O visa need health insurance to enter/re-enter Thailand?

 

Now! It is keeping me from going home to see my family and friends as it is going to be very hard to return as I am not going to help to line the pockets of this unelected soldier government via the crooked insurance companies, hospitals and hotels.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
22 hours ago, redwood1 said:

Never........But I guess things changed yesterday......I guess everyone else only needs 50,000 dollars in covid insurance...

+ Expensive PCR tests, hotel room, and the very serious possibility of being shut away for a very expensive 14 night prison sentence even if I am 100% clear of this Cvirus.

  • Like 2
Posted
22 hours ago, Berkshire said:

I wonder if this insurance requirement is COVID-driven.  That is, will it be a temporary scheme.  Hopefully it is as it's rather draconian and pointless. 

Government regulations IMO rarely cease when the reason for bringing them in ends.

Posted
22 hours ago, jacko45k said:

Let us say if you miss the opportunity, you will regret it .

Coming back as a tourist and then using an agent looks easiest.

Hopefully insurance policies will become more common and competitive....

"Hopefully insurance policies will become more common and competitive...."

No chance, insurance companies are all full of tricks with legal jargon and small print, so they can use it to prevent paying out claims.

If this posts upsets any present or past insurance employees, then that's just too bad.

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

So I guess those on a O visa need a list of insurance companies who will sell  one or two month policies to get back into Thailand after a trip out of Thailand.....Whos O visa only had a few months till renewal....

 

Edited by redwood1
  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Longwood50 said:

True and it is not just the insurance.  The cost of having a Covid test prior to departure, one upon arrival, and the quarantine even for 1 day makes a short trip to Singapore or Hong Kong costly.  

It seems that this insurance is nothing more than a hand shake between the government and the insurance companies to line pockets.  If there truly was a problem with unpaid medical bills a 100 baht fee on every incoming person would generate in a normal year over 4 billion baht.  The last normal year was 2019 and the government reported 448 baht in unpaid foreign health care bills through September 2019. In prior years it was even less. 

This seems like the government is using the old political adage to never let a crisis go to waste. 
image.png.90521c95d09a695292af11526f298a2c.png
 

And how is it fair to charge everyone money for that cannot insure or will not insure ? Plenty of people paying already for insurance then they pay double to help those that wont insure.. not fair.

 

Plus after that is done even less will have insurance as they consider the 100bt their insurance.

 

Anyway you should thank those that skipped on bills without paying for this. Been quite a few stories about that and recently about another foreigner that did not want to pay. Most expats were cheering how he should not pay the hospital.

 

You reap what you sow, besides how realistic is it to expect an old person in case of emergency fly to their home country for healthcare.. usually cannot. So its best to be insured. 

  • Confused 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
15 hours ago, david555 said:

Why they ruined their optional O-A market for backhanders by agents then ? ....Not logical ????

they moved them all to Os so still getting backhanders

  • Haha 1
Posted
14 hours ago, Leaver said:

 

They very well may push expats that are teetering on being able to afford to live here to dip into their 800k for insurance, which then makes them use an agent as they are now under their 800k, and when their money runs out, several years later, and they are past their used by date for Thailand, they are forced out of the country.      

 

That makes for more customers for agents and bigger money for corrupt immigration.  

 

They need to catch up on lost funds, due to covid.  

 

No money grabs here will surprise me in the future.  There will be many.  

 

i doubt agents\immigration could avoid the insurance if they brought it in. With the 800k process it's easy, in and out. Insurance not easy so i doubt it will be mandatory to have insurance with O

Posted
23 hours ago, poohy said:

I can see special insurance packages added to price in China to get around this

Tour price will include everything including Insurance

Remember insurance companies are thai Chinese

I'm not surprised the Chinese come into it, any unfair money making schemes in this part of the world you can be sure the Chinese will be involved somewhere.

 

  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, redwood1 said:

So I guess this is the end of quick weekend trips to Singapore, Cambodia , Laos,,,etc  From Thailand with all the new hassles of returning to Thailand.....

We can only hope this current onerous scheme is temporary but I see it lasting at least one or two years and perhaps permanent. The horror!

  • Like 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Yes.

That's going to make a lot of people unhappy.  They'll actually have to get a proper visa now, if they qualify, or leave if they don't.

I AM sympathetic, really, but I go through the hoops to follow the rules, so should they.  OK, maybe I'm not as sympathetic as I thought.  ????

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 2
  • Haha 2
Posted
20 hours ago, Tom H said:

No country for old man anymore.

It is old men who are playing at being politicians and trying to run the country. Don't let the black hair dye fool you. The Chuckle Brothers again spring to mind.

  • Haha 2
Posted
13 hours ago, Jingthing said:

The 800k needs to be in for five months, not six. Two months before extension application and three months after.

Right - just rounded up - five months versus six makes no material difference.

  • Like 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Longwood50 said:

Insurance is not about "being fair"  Insurance is about sharing and covering the risk.   

The point being that it would still be far cheaper, more expedient, and more efficient to just charge everyone a measly 100 baht than requiring everyone to submit insurance forms to immigration.  Also, whose to say that the insurance company will actually pay.  I can "guarantee" or "insure" something that promise is only as good as the insurer who likely will do its utmost to not pay or not pay in full.  

The idea of the mandatory insurance does not eliminate the nightmare and burden from the hospitals in attempting to collect money from insurance companies around the world. 

Seems like a 100 baht fee is a ,win, win, for the tourist, and the hospital.

Sorry but your about as far away from reality as it can get.

 

My health insurance has paid everything in Thailand what i need. 

 

Your 100bt would never replace insurance. So those of us that are insured pay double (not fair)

the cheap skates would think.. hey i pay 100bt now im insured and dont bother with insurance making it so that more people will not have insurance and hospitals will have to call on this fund and then the amount is too low.

 

Do you really think that 100bt would cover an expat for a whole year ?.

 

I don't mind Thailand collecting insurance and putting it in the ticket but it just wont work as the amounts should be a lot higher and those that stay here for a year or more would come out cheap.

 

Its not going to work.

 

But i agree its a hassle to show your insured and makes travel harder. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, kennw said:

Why should returning over 74's who dont need health insurance for their visa extension renewal,

Be careful what you wish for.......

  • Like 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, robblok said:

Sorry but your about as far away from reality as it can get.

 

My health insurance has paid everything in Thailand what i need. 

 

Your 100bt would never replace insurance. So those of us that are insured pay double (not fair)

the cheap skates would think.. hey i pay 100bt now im insured and dont bother with insurance making it so that more people will not have insurance and hospitals will have to call on this fund and then the amount is too low.

 

Do you really think that 100bt would cover an expat for a whole year ?.

 

I don't mind Thailand collecting insurance and putting it in the ticket but it just wont work as the amounts should be a lot higher and those that stay here for a year or more would come out cheap.

 

Its not going to work.

 

But i agree its a hassle to show your insured and makes travel harder. 

Excellent points. People need to get real. Everyone knows it's foolish to go for a holiday without travel insurance. Yet there are Senior Citizens living here receiving Government pensions only with minimal or zero savings. What do they think will happen when they have an accident or get a serious illness?

Posted

@Longwood50

 

If you mean to say just ad 100bt so the hospitals can be paid for those skipping out on their obligations and then drop the insurance check. I could live with that for sure.

 

However it must be clear that the 100bt does not mean your insured, it still means you have to pay for hospital fees if you go into a hospital then i can agree with you.

 

Its just that i fear that many will see the 100bt as their insurance payment and expect not to pay anymore. 

 

As long as its clear that the 100bt does not mean you can skip out on hospitals and your responsible for your hospital bills (either private or through insurance) then I am all for it

 

100bt is a small price to pay to get rid of one of the documents. But basically your paying for not having to show papers. Its not a payment for an insurance or make you able to claim you paid for something.

Posted
1 minute ago, The Fugitive said:

Excellent points. People need to get real. Everyone knows it's foolish to go for a holiday without travel insurance. Yet there are Senior Citizens living here receiving Government pensions only with minimal or zero savings. What do they think will happen when they have an accident or get a serious illness?

What will happen is that they either can't pay or not fully pay or drain all their savings. Lot of older people seem to think they can hop on a plane and go to their home country for treatment (often not possible). They just take the risk hoping they won't get sick and if they do its end of story.

 

I dont like paying for my insurance each and every year but it is just part of living here. 

  • Sad 1
  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...