Jump to content

Attack on child in Chiang Mai prompts action against strays


Recommended Posts

Posted

Attack on child prompts action against strays

By NISANART KANGWANWONG, 
KRIANGKRAI RATTANA 
THE NATION

 

8b2d19b31abc11f56abbc05f631a2a73.jpeg

 

AGGRESSIVE stray dogs will be taken off the streets of Chiang Mai’s Doi Saket district, after an attack on a toddler on Sunday. 

 

The 14-month-old girl is now receiving treatment at a local hospital. 

 

795de10a8063f1d722a1d5e501b069e4.jpeg

 

She has more than 100 bite wounds and is being given antibiotic injections every eight hours to ward off infection. 

The attack occurred while she was playing in front of her house and her injuries could have been fatal had workers nearby not intervened in time. 

 

The case has shocked people in the neighbourhood, underlining the fact that stray dogs are too serious a problem to continue to be overlooked. 

 

The girl’s father, Saengpetch Suwanmanee, had reported more than 30 stray dogs roaming the streets near his house. 

 

2ea362906262dd65fff4374f35a7aa8d.jpeg

 

Doi Saket district chief Atthacha Kampanartsaenyakorn agreed yesterday that urgent action was called for. “It’s necessary that we catch aggressive strays and put them in animal shelters,” he said.

 

He also vowed to make sure that all other strays are sterilised with the help of livestock officials. 

 

According to Atthacha, local residents had also offered to immediately put aggressive stray dogs in cages to prevent them from attacking more people. The parents of the young victim have already agreed to provide a corner of their land for people to place cages. A pig farm nearby, whose animals are often killed by stray dogs, has also promised to partially pay for the installation of the cages. Workers from local council bodies will also contribute. 

 

“As for the hospitalised girl, we will help to pay for her medical bills as some of her treatment is not covered by the universal healthcare scheme,” Atthacha said. 

 

The district chief was speaking after he convened a meeting on how to solve the problem of stray dogs. 

 

The meeting had actually been scheduled before the latest attack. 

 

Present at the meeting were representatives of local livestock offices, the Tambon Choeng Doi Administrative Organisation and the Tambon Luang Neua Administrative Organisation. 

 

Atthacha said local administrative bodies used to pay for female strays to be sterilised but had stopped the practice after the Office of the Auditor-General said this was not within their jurisdiction. 

 

He also claimed the |stray-dog population in the area had risen significantly since the Office of the Auditor-General decided to halt sterilisations. 

 

“They [local administrative bodies] were told livestock authorities had to handle such jobs,” he said. 

 

Atthacha said his office also intended to raise public awareness of the problem with strays and encouraged people to never abandon their pets. 

 

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/detail/national/30357943

 
thenation_logo.jpg
-- © Copyright The Nation 2018-11-06
Posted
7 hours ago, HappyAndRich said:

This is not only a problem in Chiang Mai. I say, exterminate all of them on a nationwide scale.

I agree wholeheartedly even though I like PET dogs. There are 20 odd in my small community they could start with. Noisy beggars.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Doi Saket district chief Atthacha Kampanartsaenyakorn agreed yesterday that urgent action was called for.
“It’s necessary that we catch aggressive strays and put them in animal shelters,” 
he said.

but I say put stray dogs down.
and tag "legal" dogs whose tag-owners then become responsible for the dog's 
behavior.

Posted
17 minutes ago, jesimps said:

I agree wholeheartedly even though I like PET dogs. There are 20 odd in my small community they could start with. Noisy beggars.

Right, I have 3 dogs myself. That I take care of of course. Walking out with them in leech 3 times a day, picking up their litter, feeding them and playing with them. Even built a dog house in the garden of 30 sqm. When I close the gate they can run free in the garden of course. That´s how to take care of dogs. All others is just to get rid of. By the way, I am all for registration and tax om dogs too. I just thought that 450 as was a suggestion is too small. For people to take care of their dogs it must be at least 1500-2500 per year.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Posted

Remember: Soi dogs and feral dogs have more rights than humans.  Defending your child from a dog attack can land you in prison for animal cruelty.  But then again, if it was my child, I'd disable the dog(s) in any manner necessary to stop the attack and deal with the consequences at a later date including hiring a lawyer to defend my action and to sue the hell out of the owner of the animals and have them put down as a public menace.  And I'm a dog owner.  If one of my dogs savaged a child, I'd take responsibility and my dog's days would be numbered.  There is no excuse.

Posted
4 hours ago, markaoffy said:

When living in Ayutthaya I used my own methods for dangerous Muts! They loved meat, and if laced with some chemicals... well it was an excruciating death !

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Thaivisa Connect

 

 

And when you're caught, you'll be jailed as you should be.  And if I knew who you were I'd turn you into the authorities myself. 
What you have stated is against the law, and being against the law it is also breaking forum rules.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, richard_smith237 said:

Its the cost and time issue - Sterilisation is not practice in such numbers and no government body is prepared to go to such expense.

 

No but I'd support a local private organizations such as the Soi Dog Foundation if they were formed in my local area.  Heck, I'd volunteer as I like animals and it would be a good use of my time..  Almost all dogs are salvageable and trainable, and the few that are not need to be put down.  Highly aggressive dogs don't need to be added to the gene pool but the method of euthanizing them needs to be compassionate and humane.  I have only accolades for organizations which concentrate on sterilizing the animal population and for providing low cost sterilization to low income families as well as public education.
Rabies on the other hand is a public health hazard to humans and as such the government need to get involved in providing vaccines nationwide.  If the government refuses to cull animal, then it's their responsibility to inoculate them so rabies isn't be passed on to humans.

  • Like 1
Posted
9 hours ago, webfact said:

They [local administrative bodies] were told livestock authorities had to handle such jobs,” he said. 

And obviously, the livestock authorities are unaware of their role.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...