Thanks for your reply. And no, I'm not from Christiania — that place arose in 1971 after my teen years — I'm a teen from 'Summer of 69'...😎 And yes, I agree in 'made by morals police' — actually my point with mentioning culture — also the difference between hebephile and more legal ephebophile is kind of floating, depending of both the look and expressions of the young ladies. Many Thai girls look much younger, than their physical age, while numerous Western girls look more mature; even like a grownup house wife, but still fairly young teen. Time has changed — or rather all time things are changing — which also was my point. Back in time — relative long time ago — age of consent was 12 years in Britain, raised to 13 years in 1875. It would be out of Western mind today to think of relationship with so young women, even that they at this age is more mature now than back then. Science quote: «In the 19th century, the average age for girls to have their first period was around 17 years. Today, the average age has fallen to around 13 years. This significant decline is explained, among other things, by better living conditions, healthier nutrition, fewer infections, and more recently, hormone-disrupting substances in the environment.» In a way worth thinking about...🤔 According to science it's a healthy signal that men — also mature and elder men — is interested in young women; i.e., girls that are ready as a woman. So, being hebephile and ephebophile —interested in very young and young ladies — is actually scientifically correct, but cultural wrong. Our lifestyle with women's liberalization and education also makes the cultural limits in place — our culture try to prevent teenage pregnancies, which makes good sense compared to today's lifestyle — however, our male genes and lusts are mainly still stock in homo sapiens version 1.0...😍