32 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

I will always confront hate speech whenever I encounter it. Just the way I was raised. Pls try to be respectful to other forum users, there is no excuse for name calling and insulting a persons disabilties.

Obviously, you have a moral compass about hate speech and insulting other's disabilities.

 

So why do you subscribe to an ex-president who has the very personal attributes that you detest and cannot tolerate?

Condemning the hate speech of Donald Trump — American Baptist Home Mission Societies (abhms.org)

Donald Trump mocks disabled reporter- POLITICO

Reported post and response removed.

2 hours ago, Walker88 said:

While you are likely correct. I look at the totality of his adult life: there is NOTHING---from his name to his 'charity' that he did not try to monetize. Given that, I am led to believe he looked at secrets as a kind of 401K. We shall see.

 

What seems to have driven him in life---and helps explains his inability to accept his bludgeoning in the 2020 election---was that according to family and friends, his father always called him a "LOSER". That is why he is obsessed with that term. His own claims about his start in business are pure lies. He claims a 'small loan' from his father.

 

In point of fact---according to bank records---he was given a couple hundred thousand dollars a month 'allowance from the age of 3 until his father died. He also 'inherited' $412 million from his father's estate. Also, every bank loan he got from US banks---back when they still loaned him money---was co-signed by his father. He did nothing on his own.

 

Despite all of that---hundreds of millions of cash inflow---he declared six bankruptcies, and in casinos of all things (plus The Plaza Hotel). People come to casinos to lose money, yet he found a way to bankrupt casinos 6 times. That demonstrates an extraordinary lack of business skill. When his father still lived, 45 had to listen to his dad calling him a LOSER re the bankruptcies, plus all of his other shuttered businesses like his airline, travel agency, USFL team, steaks, water, and his failed university where 'students' sued him and won.

    Had he not been born rich and not had his father's large fortune to squander away, he likely would have been an assistant manager at a Burger King or McDonald's.   Daddy was right--he is a loser, in so many different ways.

3 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Your 2nd link. Its false. Up there with Politico's 50 top intel people guarantee.... That is just the way he impersonates people. Nothing to do with this guy being retarded. I have video of him impersonating other people with exactly the same motions. Sorry, this claim is false and debunked.

 

As for Trump saying hurtful things about Ilhan Omar. Well, he was proven absolutely spot on wasnt he. It was called a conspiracy theory, yet when seriously investigated with DNA and science he was proven correct(once again). And she was above the law as it turned out. 

https://nypost.com/2021/08/15/fbi-dodged-ilhan-omar-bro-wed-probe-devine/

 

Im done here, getting dragged off topic to counter smears and misinformation that has caused such hatred and division against the best president we ever had.

It was Trump who caused hatred and division in the USA. You are a typical example of that. In fact most of the people here are united.

The only ignorance being displayed is in fact from you and other Trump supporters. Everyone else is able to present their cases in a cogent manner, with accompanying documentation if necessary.

Whereas Trump supporters can only resort to name calling and filthy smears. 

This thread is about Trump. You seem unable to accept that he does anything wrong. You are worshipping a false idol. Get your head straight.

 

Some off topic posts removed, we are getting way off topic here

2 hours ago, tilaceer said:

His "gait" is most likely due to the fact that the narcissist wears lifts in his shoes to try and appear taller than he really is.

His overall stature, as well as the way he walks, is because he wears a corset, according to his niece.  Notice when he stands he's always bent forward at the waist, and when he sits he leans forward.  Rarely do we see him in shirt sleaves because he needs a jacket to cover the fat.

 

Fox News host wonders aloud whether Trump could have tried to sell highly classified material to the Russians or Saudis

Probably not for cash, but for favor absolutely.  A question to pursue is "why these particular documents?" 

 

I'm looking forward to the GOP primary debates.  They should be starting about a year from now.  Liz is not only going to eviscerate DT, but all the brown-nosed invertebrates, including the usual _ss clowns, like Rubio, Cruz, R Paul.  I'd like to see that empty suit Tom Cotton reduced to car-wash rags by both DT and Liz. 

 

I still say Dept. of Homeland Security should issue a threat alert regarding DT's defaming of the LE agencies and pull his security detail.  One more incident like the fool who attacked the FBI last week could do it, IMO.

 

 

2 hours ago, Walker88 said:

Disability? The guy cannot even remember what foot had the 'bone spurs'.

 

In any event, it didn't stop him from playing tennis.

 

45 is a coward. Not a single person from his family, since his grandad immigrated from Germany and his mother took advantage of chain migration, has served. Zero.

It is seems to be a family tradition. His pimp grandad actually left Germany in order to dodge military service there.

Tucker Carlson thinks the Donald will be indicted.

 

https://thehill-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/thehill.com/homenews/3603784-tucker-carlson-trump-obviously-going-to-be-indicted/amp/?amp_gsa=1&amp_js_v=a9&usqp=mq331AQIKAGwASCAAgM%3D#amp_tf=From %1%24s&aoh=16607244057717&csi=0&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fthehill.com%2Fhomenews%2F3603784-tucker-carlson-trump-obviously-going-to-be-indicted%2F

4 hours ago, Walker88 said:

Liz Cheney gave an impassioned speech tonight about the threat to freedom and democracy that 45 represents. She ripped the fat guy a new one, saying real Americans should unite to make sure 45 never gets near the Oval Office ever again.

 

I think it would be entertaining for her to declare as a repub candidate for POTUS. Imagine the debates! She is clever enough to know how to goad him and call him out both on his contempt for the Constitution, his willful ignorance, and his abject weakness as a man. She would emasculate him on live TV. In fact, I bet he would refuse to go to a debate if Cheney were there. At his core he's a weakling and a coward, and in particular, strong women get him shaking in his tighty whities.

 

Remember the silliness in 2016 when he responded to comments about his really short fingers and what they suggested about his junk? That he felt it necessary to state on live TV in a US Presidential debate that 'women never complained about that thing' shows how insecure he is about his junk. When Stormy came out and said "Not freakishly small but well below average" he tried to silence her and press her on the NDA.

 

Cheney is clever enough to take the debate below the belt. She would slay him.

Ah well. Not so much the slayer but the slain now..............

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-62569056

 

 

3 hours ago, Eric Loh said:

Laura Ingraham telling listeners to turn a page on Trump and move pass him for next election. 

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/laura-ingraham-turn-page-donald-trump-1397534/

She didn't่. Take care. 

4 minutes ago, nauseus said:

She didn't่. Take care. 

Ingraham casting doubt on Trump’s 2024 prospects comes a week after the FBI raided Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home and seized dozens of boxes of evidence in relation to an investigation into potential violations of the Espionage Act. In a reaction to the raid, Ingraham expressed skepticism about what Trump could actually do to curb the effects of the investigation. 

3 minutes ago, ThailandRyan said:

Ingraham casting doubt on Trump’s 2024 prospects comes a week after the FBI raided Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home and seized dozens of boxes of evidence in relation to an investigation into potential violations of the Espionage Act. In a reaction to the raid, Ingraham expressed skepticism about what Trump could actually do to curb the effects of the investigation. 

Read back - it's not far - Eric's post is misleading and incorrect because Ingraham did not tell listeners to turn a page on Trump.  

23 minutes ago, nauseus said:

Read back - it's not far - Eric's post is misleading and incorrect because Ingraham did not tell listeners to turn a page on Trump.  

You mean this quote

"longtime Trump sycophant Laura Ingraham believes voters might feel it’s time to “turn the page” on the former president and opt for “someone who has all of Trump’s policies who’s not Trump.”

 

Or this part:

 

Sources indicated that Trump felt Ingraham might not support him in 2024,

 

Or this One:

 

Ingraham discussed the potential response to a third presidential bid by Trump, and warned that the country was “exhausted” by the “constant battle” Trump represents.

 

Sure sounds to me like she has started to turn the page herself and letting others know there is need for another person and not Trump, but then that is the way I read it.

5 minutes ago, ThailandRyan said:

You mean this quote

"longtime Trump sycophant Laura Ingraham believes voters might feel it’s time to “turn the page” on the former president and opt for “someone who has all of Trump’s policies who’s not Trump.”

 

Or this part:

 

Sources indicated that Trump felt Ingraham might not support him in 2024,

 

Or this One:

 

Ingraham discussed the potential response to a third presidential bid by Trump, and warned that the country was “exhausted” by the “constant battle” Trump represents.

 

Sure sounds to me like she has started to turn the page herself and letting others know there is need for another person and not Trump, but then that is the way I read it.

Maybe she needs replacing with one of the die hard cult supporters on this thread? 

38 minutes ago, nauseus said:

She didn't่. Take care. 

She did if you understand her implied message when she say that exhausted voters are ready to turn the page on Trump. Of course you can choose to ignore what she was implying when she spoke on Lisa Boothe podcast. She soft selling for DeSantis. 

34 minutes ago, ThailandRyan said:

You mean this quote

"longtime Trump sycophant Laura Ingraham believes voters might feel it’s time to “turn the page” on the former president and opt for “someone who has all of Trump’s policies who’s not Trump.”

 

Or this part:

 

Sources indicated that Trump felt Ingraham might not support him in 2024,

 

Or this One:

 

Ingraham discussed the potential response to a third presidential bid by Trump, and warned that the country was “exhausted” by the “constant battle” Trump represents.

 

Sure sounds to me like she has started to turn the page herself and letting others know there is need for another person and not Trump, but then that is the way I read it.

Try watching the VDO to listen to what she actually said instead of quoting this rhetorical wishful thinking

1 hour ago, nauseus said:

Ah well. Not so much the slayer but the slain now..............

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-62569056

 

 

Whether this matters or not depends entirely on what her future plans are.

 

She’s clearly not courting the alt-right Trump wing of the GOP, perhaps she’s concluded it has no viable future.

 

I don’t particularly like her politics, but she’s nobody’s fool.

25 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

She did if you understand her implied message when she say that exhausted voters are ready to turn the page on Trump. Of course you can choose to ignore what she was implying when she spoke on Lisa Boothe podcast. She soft selling for DeSantis. 

You are making things up - Ingraham did not tell listeners to turn a page on Trump, or turn anything ese. 

 

Implied, implying? Cods.

   

Enough of this garbage. I'm outahere.

 

8 hours ago, stevenl said:

You couldn't care less about Trump? Looking at your posts that is unbelievable.

And as usual shifting the blame. As president he took this, he is responsible.

You really are clueless aren't you? I believe if a democrat ex-pres had done this there would be no investigation and that this will be drawn out till mid-terms in a desperate attempt to salvage the tarnished image of biden. You think folks who post proTrump posts are automatically MAGA guys. Me I really don't want Trump to run again.

 

The sloppiness of the White house's record keeping is certainly in question. 

 

Oh yeah, it's entertaining reading all the over the top anti Trump comments. Such insane hatred  ????

 

 

well here we are all these days later and Trump is still not under arrest.
Why is this so?

10 minutes ago, nauseus said:

Try watching the VDO to listen to what she actually said instead of quoting this rhetorical wishful thinking

Inconclusive in the way she speaks, no stressors on certain words to deny what she is saying are her beliefs or what she see's in others this after being his friend for 25 years.  As I said my take on it is what I posted.  Unless you can break her words down syllable by syllable she did say what I have quoted.

1 minute ago, wombat said:

well here we are all these days later and Trump is still not under arrest.
Why is this so?

one word look it up "Investigation"

3 minutes ago, wombat said:

well here we are all these days later and Trump is still not under arrest.
Why is this so?

Due process.

 

Don’t do it fast, do it right.

3 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Whether this matters or not depends entirely on what her future plans are.

 

She’s clearly not courting the alt-right Trump wing of the GOP, perhaps she’s concluded it has no viable future.

 

I don’t particularly like her politics, but she’s nobody’s fool.

Her future plans were to return to Congress! Of course it matters.

Just now, nauseus said:

Her future plans were to return to Congress! Of course it matters.

A whole new world has been opened up to her now.  She will not have to step down from her position in order to run as a candidate or as a VP hopeful........her daddy told me so.

1 minute ago, nauseus said:

Her future plans were to return to Congress! Of course it matters.

Never underestimate a woman.

9 minutes ago, nauseus said:

You are making things up - Ingraham did not tell listeners to turn a page on Trump, or turn anything ese. 

 

Implied, implying? Cods.

   

More than implied:

 

You can listen directly to her here in on the vid:

 

https://twitter.com/therecount/status/1559282901367259136

 

11 minutes ago, nauseus said:

You are making things up - Ingraham did not tell listeners to turn a page on Trump, or turn anything ese. 

 

Implied, implying? Cods.

   

You need to handle hurt a bit better. 

6 minutes ago, ThailandRyan said:

Inconclusive in the way she speaks, no stressors on certain words to deny what she is saying are her beliefs or what she see's in others this after being his friend for 25 years.  As I said my take on it is what I posted.  Unless you can break her words down syllable by syllable she did say what I have quoted.

She was not telling anyone to do anything however you spin it.